Lying in the Sun

Brunt Bit by Bit Part 1

Brunt Bit by Bit - Part 1 ...


         ... His "Special" and somewhat Shockingly Irresponsible Report



If there is one thing that is obvious, is that Martin Brunt, Sky, Crime Correspondent, The Twit people who are McCann Supporters on Twitter that is those who Brunt stated organised this so called dossier, Jim Gamble (former police chief NI) authors Summers & Swan also, Rupert Murdoch, and possibly the Metropolitan Police, and of course the McCanns themselves colluded in the making of Brunt's shockingly irresponsible and misleading 'Special Report' which involved the attack on Brenda Leyland.  


This lady had it seems been under threat by very nasty McCann supporters (trolls to those of you who prefer this ridiculous and infantile description of nasty people) who had for many months been sending this lady some of the most terrifyingly violent threats, nasty violent despicable people who threatened her life.  Material that decent folk could not even conjure up lest put in print!  


With this in mind, one must ask DID BRUNT KNOW OF THIS?


It would be difficult to see how he could not have done.   Yet he carried on with his 'special report' his special attack on this lady.


Make no mistake, Brunt knew exactly what he was doing in taking on the role which he did in this ghastly and tragic affair.  Brunt has been reporting on the McCann case since Madeleine mysteriously vanished without trace.


Brunt should have known better!

AND LET US BE CLEAR ON THIS, BRENDA LEYLAND BROKE NO LAW IN ANY LAND.  SHE DID NOT THREATEN, TEXT OR SEND TWEETS TO THE McCANNS.  SHE DID NOT GO NEAR THEIR HOME, STALK THEM, EITHER ON, OR OFFLINE!

Martin Brunt/Sky, on the other hand  TOOK THE LAW IN HIS OWN HANDS by ATTACKING Ms LEYLAND AS HE DID!


Martin Brunt we also know, days before 
his ATTACK on Brenda Leyland became a ‘follower’ of Ms Leyland on Twitter.


Intimidating behaviour by Brunt?

Ms Leyland, lodged a tweet stating this, asking why Martin Brunt was now ‘following’ her (on Twitter?)

Some say Brunt did not hound Ms Leyland, as his ONE ATTACK outside her home does not constitute ‘hounding’ but it was not simply this ONE ATTACK outside her home – HE BEGAN “following” her on Twitter days before – and it was clearly not to befriend this lady.  It was the run up to what was a well planned attack, where collusion absolutely had to have taken place between the aforementioned persons!


All of whom would have known that this attack by Martin Brunt, his special report was imminent, known exactly when it was to be broadcast!

DOES THAT CONSTITUTE HOUNDING/STALKING?   Absolutely!  


Ms Leyland it is said, posted a tweet that should she meet an untimely death for others to question.



Ms Leyland was found dead in an hotel room soon after Martin Brunt had harassed her outside her home.  Soon after he put the "frighteners" on her.


Martin Brunt took the law in his own hands.  He did not wait to see if there was any foundation to the accusations he made when he accused her of having attacked the McCanns on Twitter.   He did not wait to see if the police had any cause to speak with her let alone charge her with having committed any offence.


Did Brunt together with ALL who colluded in this abhorrent 'Special Report' ALL of the above aforementioned persons stop for a moment to think what the result of their actions against an innocent woman would be?


Did they even care?


What precisely was it that he/they hoped to achieve by attacking this lady in the way that he/they did?


What would have been their favoured outcome?  


Brunt and the other must have had something in mind, known what was their aim, their goal?



l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com
1st November 2014
 

Website Builder