Lying in the Sun

Maddie's Mum Mothers Day

Maddie's Mum - Mothers Day -2016

The Mums who failed Madeleine

Image result for kate mccann crimewatch
Kate McCann

Dr Fiona PayneJane TannerRachael Oldfield

Fiona Payne    Jane Tanner   Rachael Oldfield



Another Mother's Day where Kate McCann is without her daughter.

Another year and Madeleine Beth McCann is still missing.

Another year gone by, where Madeleine if alive, has waited for her mommy, and her buddies to help her.

More than odd/suspicious, that FOUR MOTHERS would not!

For certain, if these four mums came clean, UNTURNED the stones, the pieces of the puzzle which they hold, then this case would be blown wide open.

Again I say, and in agreement with, retired British detective John Stalker who was spot on when he announced in the press that these mums, and their partners, four male doctors ARE hiding something!

Sadly for Madeleine, the likelihood of any of these mums helping her in this way is scant to zero!

Unless one of these mums develop a conscience, can find it in their hearts to do what is right, to do what any mother would for their child - lay down her life - then for Madeleine, all hope is as lost, as she is!



Image result for kate mccann crimewatch

Kate McCann, Maddie's mum.  



  • Kate McCann refused to answer, when interviewed by police, more than 40 questions put to her - it was her legal right to do so, but Madeleine had the right to the best chance of being found, and her mother assisting police, answering those questions would unquestionably have aided the investigation to find this missing child. Sadly for the child, her mother had quite different ideas!

Kate McCann and lowlife spokesman Clarence Mitchell, in interview, have always stated that she was advised by her lawyer not to answer.

So much for the missing child, the child they thought was being held by paedophiles, COMING FIRST!    

This mother put herself BEFORE HER CHILD!

  • Kate McCann (Gerry McCann/their team) kept hidden, from the public, for YEARS and YEARS, the E.Fit images which they themselves had drawn up, of a man, witnesses claim to have seen, carrying off a child of Madeleine's description on the night she vanished.

To date, Kate McCann has given NO EXPLANATION as the mother of the missing child as to WHY she would do this, harm her missing child in this way. No explanation whatsoever from this mother as to why she would seriously hinder, AGAIN, what could be considered the child's chances of being found, and returned home to her family.

It was reported in press that a member of their team said they did not have the money to release it.

What a load of utter crap.  There was plenty of money in Madeleine's Fund!

WE DON'T EVER HEAR OF THERE BEING NO MONEY TO PAY ANY OF THEIR LAWYERS,
AND THEY HAVE LAWYERS IN UK AND PORTUGAL. THREE DIFFERENT COMPANIES I UNDERSTAND.  NEVER SHORT OF MONEY TO PAY THEIR PRESS AGENCY IN PORTUGAL   WE DON'T HEAR OF CLARENCE MITCHELL, NOT BEING PAID - THE LOWLIFE SPOKESPERSON WHO IS STILL, NINE YEARS AFTER THE CHILD WAS REPORTED MISSING, KEPT ON A RETAINER, AND WHO TO DATE HAS COST MADELEINE, HER FUND £hundreds thousands - the guy doesn't come cheap.

But according to the report in press - NO MONEY FOR MADELEINE!

ALL THAT MONEY DONATED BY THE PUBLIC -
AND NO MONEY FOR MADELEINE?

Why is it that there is NEVER any or enough money for Madeleine, while ever other bastard is being paid?

In the five year period from when the E. Fits were created, until the time they appeared in the public domain (courtesy of the Metropolitan Police)- this mom and her other half, Gerry McCann appeared in many TV interviews.  Even IF we go along with the line that they had no money, how easy it would have been for them to have HELD UP THE IMAGE, for the cameras for the viewing audience, the image of the suspect, during one of these interviews.  

They DID NOT DO THAT.   And they DID NOT make any mention of the existence of the images.

How easy it would have been to post the image on their website.

This mother, Kate McCann posts messages, appeals on her site, YET FOR A PERIOD OF FIVE YEARS - SHE FAILED TO POST OR MENTION THE E.FITS.   

Madeleine once more failed by her MOTHER!

WHY WOULD A MOM OF A MISSING CHILD, FAIL THAT CHILD SO BADLY?

WHY WOULD A MOM OF A MISSING CHILD SIT ON THOSE E.FITS FOR FIVE YEARS, KEEP THEM FROM THE PUBLIC?

MORE TO THE POINT - HOW COULD SHE?   HOW COULD SHE DO THAT TO MADELEINE?

HOW COULD SHE GET UP EVERY DAY/SIT IN INTERVIEWS, KNOWING WHAT ELSE SHE WAS SITTING ON - PERHAPS MADELEINE'S BEST CHANCE OF BEING FOUND?

And that is EXACTLY how Gerry McCann describes these E.Fits on the Crimewatch programme of October 2013 - as MADELEINE'S BEST CHANCE OF BEING FOUND.

They appeared on Crimewatch, October 2013, and never made any mention whatsoever, gave no explanation about these E.Fits, yet had the gall to state FIVE YEARS AFTER THEY WERE DRAWN UP, that they were MADELEINE'S BEST CHANCE OF BEING FOUND!

This mum, and dad, had more photo opportunities than one can shake a stick at where to have held those E.Fits up for the world to see was so easy, and it would not have cost them a thing!

  • How many TV interviews did Kate McCann take part, in those five years when she kept the E.Fits hidden from public view, where she could have mentioned and held up the image FOR FREE?

  • How many times during those FIVE YEARS, did she pose for the press when taking part in a road race, a race where her vest displayed a picture of Madeleine, a vest which could easily have displayed the E.FIT IMAGE - FOR FREE?

  • How many times, during those FIVE YEARS, did she and Gerry McCann stand on the steps of the Court in Lisbon and spout their nonsense, yet DID NOT hold up the E.Fit images?  They could have done, AND FOR FREE!
McCanns were being interviewed around the world - YET NOTHING!

NEVER did they speak of the E. Fits they knew they had in their possession, and NEVER did they, FOR MADELEINE, MAKE THEM KNOWN TO THE WORLD?

McCanns when interviewed by Sandra Felguiras, held up images of a man they were NOT LOOKING FOR?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MV4Ck61Favg

3.36

The image they displayed alongside the E.Fit of the man THEY SAID THEY BELIEVED ABDUCTED MADELEINE, the image of the man Jane Tanner said she had seen.

SO WHAT PREVENTED THIS MOTHER OF A MISSING CHILD DOING LIKEWISE WITH THE E.FITS, WHICH SHE AND HER TEAM HAD DRAWN UP, of the man the Metropolitan Police are saying is their main suspect?

WHY WOULD A MOTHER DO THAT?

It will come as no surprise if today in the press we have a POOR ME STORY, a story of Kate McCanns agony, a follow up to the recent nonsense in this same vein.  

WHERE will Madeleine be in the Kate saga, a never ending series of what Kate does, how Kate feels, What Kate will do next?

AS EVER - BOTTOM OF THE PILE!

The E. Fits are now considered by the Met Police in UK as the main suspect in their still ongoing investigation.  Mother Met, sadly for Madeleine, held on to these images too, for a period of around 13 months before releasing them. 

So no rush by any of them to help the child.





Rachael Oldfield

Rachael 'resuscitation'  Oldfield, McCann holiday buddy.

Rachael Oldfield.  Her child was ill, when on this vacation.  She abandoned her child too, night after night, a child who was also under the age of 3 years, in an apartment while she joined the McCanns and others each night to wine, and dine.  

Rachael Oldfield did NOT go check on her child, it was too dark and scary the route from the bar to the apartment she said.

How the hell did she think he kid felt being left alone?

Rachael dismissed the idea that Madeleine may have had an accident when alone in the apartment and died from her injuries by stating that had Madeleine required resuscitation that there were plenty of doctors in the group who could have performed this.

But what if the doctors arrived too late to resuscitate, and failed to save the child?

It is one thing to state that doctors were plentiful, but clearly they would be of no fucking use to man nor beast if they were not around when the kid perhaps had an accident, didn't arrive back in time to resuscitate her!

Dr Fiona Payne
Fiona Payne - Kate McCanns best buddy.

Payne didn't check on her kids.   She left her two kids alone in an apartment too.  A baby of around one year, and another under 3 year old.   She had a baby monitor, so relied on that.  No need to check on her kids physically.

She is the one who gave the following statement to the Leicestershire Police in the UK a RATHER DAMNING statement against her best buddy, Kate McCann.

KATE McCann has always claimed that Madeleine would never have been able to slide open the unlocked patio door.

FIONA PAYNE told police otherwise of Kate McCann she said:

"She did, she brought it up, and that she, I mean this is awful in retrospect as well, she asked what my opinion was, erm, tut, on whether they were okay leaving the, the doors, unlocked, because she was saying - ' Is it better that if Madeleine wakes up she can get out and find us or erm, locking it, and you know, finding that we're not there and the door's locked if she woke up.'


http://l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com/Best_Friends.html
 

Jane Tanner

Jane Tanner
 
Now what about Jane, where does one begin?   The mum who claimed to have seen a man carrying off a child who she believed was Madeleine.  The man who she and the McCanns said had busted open the shutter on the window, the window, climbed in, and then removed Madeleine.

Yet strangely, AFTER this guy is supposed to have done this, after Jane Tanner saw him walk off, she FAILED to notice when continuing on her way to the apartments, that the shutter was busted and raised all the way up.  Failed to notice the open window, the window which was open as far as it was possible to open it.  And didn't notice, on what Kate McCann described as a windy night the curtains of that room billowing.   And I would say that they must have been - a windy night window wide open, shutter fully up, those curtains would have been blowing in and out of that window?

But not to worry, retired Met detective Andy Redwood had a revelation moment, one which saved Tanner's skin.  He decided - for no apparent reason, with NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT- to change the timeline of the movements of this group as per their police witness statements, said that the alleged abductor didn't strike until much later, so presumably he didn't open that shutter and window until later, and in so doing Redwood gave Tanner a get out of jail card, as she would not have seen an open window when on her way to the apartment at that time.

BUT YOU SEE.  JUST SAY THAT THE MAN TANNER CLAIMS TO HAVE SEEN WAS INDEED THE MAN THE METROPOLITAN POLICE CLAIM CAME FORWARD, THE MAN KNOWN AS CRECHEMAN, DOES THIS/WOULD THIS THEN AUTOMATICALLY MEAN THAT THE ALLEGED ABDUCTOR STRUCK AT JUST BEFORE 10 PM?

WHAT IF HE STRUCK JUST AFTER THIS GUY WALKED BY?  NOTHING WE KNOW OF TO SAY OTHERWISE.   NOTHING TO SAY THAT AN ALLEGED ABDUCTOR STRUCK AT 10 PM?

GUY COULD HAVE STRUCK JUST AFTER TANNER ENTERED HER APARTMENT.

REDWOOD HAD NO REASON, OR EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT SAYING - AN ALLEGED ABDUCTOR STRUCK AT JUST BEFORE 10!


Unfortunately, Tanner had told many more tales than the one about the man she had seen, none of which adds up!

And unfortunately too for Madeleine 'Mother Met' like the other mothers in this case, had failed to explain at what time the window and shutter were opened. Failed to explain how the alleged intruder got in and out of that apartment.

AND FAILED to explain how that bedroom door came to be more widely open at the time of Gerry McCanns check and that the claimed check of the McCann children by Matthew Oldfield.

If Mother Met is saying the alleged intruder did not arrive until just before 10 PM then that blows Gerry McCanns story and that of Matthew Oldfield right out of the water!

Shame on all of the mothers and fathers in the McCann group, who ALL, according to their police witness statements, abandoned and neglected EIGHT little kids in the various apartments, all kids under the age of 4 years of age, and some of whom were unwell.

Shame on mum Kate McCann in all of those TV interviews to say that she felt safe, so safe that she did not even have to give it a thought, that there was no decision to be made (see McCann spinning blogs above) when in fact in yet another interview she told an entirely different tale.  When her best buddy, Fiona Payne gave the police in Leicester UK a quite different tale to that of Kate McCann.

So which mum of the the two best buddies was being truthful if any?


Image result for kate mccann crimewatch
Kate McCann who claims Madeleine would not have been able to slide open the unlocked patio door and get out to go look for her and Gerry McCann, who claimed it felt safe to leave the children in an unlocked apartment, who claimed in numerous interviews that she did not even have to make a decision about leaving her kids it felt so safe, yet does contradict this also in others.

OR

Dr Fiona Payne
Best buddy Fiona Payne gave a statement to police where she claimed Kate McCann did show concern at having left that patio door unlocked, telling police:

"She did, she brought it up, and that she, I mean this is awful in retrospect as well, she asked what my opinion was, erm, tut, on whether they were okay leaving the, the doors, unlocked, because she was saying - ' Is it better that if Madeleine wakes up she can get out and find us or erm, locking it, and you know, finding that we're not there and the door's locked if she woke up.'

Perhaps the columnist Katie Hopkins, who has recently been allowed to ask some question re the case of missing Madeleine, might too be allowed to ask who is telling the truth:

Mum Kate McCann or her best buddy, mum Fiona Payne -  because at least one of them ain't be honest!

And it makes a huge difference to the case of missing Madeleine, when those who claim to have been caring for her, are not being truthful!

Apart from that, are we to believe that Kate McCann is happy with this statement by Fiona Payne, as without question, Payne, if not outright calling Kate McCann a liar, is raising awareness of the DIFFERENCE IN THEIR STORIES, and a very serious issue it is too - THAT UNLOCKED PATIO DOOR!

Perhaps this Mother's Day, these four mums will reflect on their statements, and their refusals to help this missing little girl


l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com
6th March 2016


Website Builder