Lying in the Sun

McCanns Chief Suspects

McCanns Chief Suspects


'Saying nothing is the worst crime of all'

McCanns 



Two Questions:

1.     Are they chief suspects?

If not,

2.   Why not?

Those are the questions anyone having watched Richard M. Hall’s documentary who had not previously followed the McCann case will be asking.

The questions that those who have followed have been asking for over seven years!

The Hall documentary, though not exact in some areas, overall was spot on, that is in highlighting the many lies and inconsistencies in the stories told by the McCanns and their buddies.

The very same lies which the many great blogs and  forums seeking justice for young Madeleine McCann have been highlighting for past seven years.

The self same lies, the Portuguese Police and the Leicestershire Police discovered also.

And it is these lies and inconsistencies, the reason why they lied, which is crucial to discovering what happened to Madeleine.

Anyone who believes this child was abducted by a stranger absolutely must give themselves a shake, take a long hard look at the evidence in this case.

And the question they must ask:

Why if the McCanns and their buddies – played NO part in Madeleine’s disappearance – as Gerry McCanns once said, did they LIE?

And not lie once, but many times!

And why pay a guy Clarence Mitchell to lie for them?

His lies cost £70,000 per year, and for seven years, that’s more than a few bucks.

And why would any mother of a missing child refuse to co-operate with police, refuse to answer their questions?

That has got to be the biggie of them all.

If your child was missing, it wouldn’t matter to you if the police asked you to do cartwheels on a cliff edge whilst you answered – For your missing daughter, who you believed was abducted by paedophiles – you’d give your very life.

Kate McCann?   She gave NOTHING, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!

She preferred to spit venom at an elderly resident who lived in the block of flats from where Madeleine vanished, she preferred to call the police officer derogatory names, Fucking Tossers being but one. Such a foul mouthed female.

What makes the mother of a missing child behave in this way, and added to which, she never bothered to go out and physically search for the child.

Any mother I know would have been out there screaming their child's name all night long, in case that child was trapped somewhere, afraid cold, but would be comforted by the sound of her mother's voice, comforted knowing her mummy was looking for her, coming to get her.

Not Kate McCann - She gave NOTHING!


She and Gerry McCann kept undisclosed also from the public, for FIVE years, E.Fits of a suspect.  


The following words ironically from the McCanns online Site.

Day 903 : 22/10/2009

 

 

Thursday

22-10-09- NEW ENTRY PAGE CAPTIONS

If you stay quiet you are as guilty as those who took her.

A little girl stolen?

A family torn apart.

But saying nothing is the worst crime of all.

The world is watching.

If you know something. Say something

Its never too late to do the right thing

One phone call, one email, can end one family’s nightmare

Imagine if she was your child.

Imagine the pain and the grief. 

Imagine if someone like you never came forward



Indeed, Imagine Kate McCann how different things might have been if you had SPOKEN up, if you had not committed the worst crime of all - The Crime of Silence.

Imagine if you, Gerry McCann, and all of your buddies had done the right thing - Not Lied  

But that brings us full circle, THE LIES AND INCONSISTENCIES remain.

How could DCI Andy Redwood not have these people in his sights when there is more evidence against them than any other person.

View Richard Hall's DVD's and also the many great sites, such as Joana Morais, McCannfiles/Nigel Moore/Dr Martin Roberts, Pamalan/Gerry McCanns Blog spot/Missing Madeleine, Pat Brown Profiler and articles by the retired police officer known as Peter Mac, so many to mention, the Hi de Ho videos, all the wonderful people who have given so much of their time for justice for this child, together with the thousands of individuals who too show their support for Madeleine Beth McCann.  Who demand that her parents EXPLAIN their story of ABDUCTION as it makes not a jot of sense, and there is no evidence to support it.

The McCanns and their buddies refused to take part in a reconstruction also, and they, have too, particularly Gerry McCann dissed the cadaver dogs as being incredibly unreliable, dogs which alerted correctly in over 200 cases.

Why would they get it wrong in the McCann case, on Kate McCanns clothes?

This is what Kate McCann had to say about their buddies not helping her child by refusing the reconstruction - she is nonchalant.  Any other mother would have been dragging their sorry asses to Portugal.

Not Kate McCann - She gave nothing to Madeleine, she supported her buddies!

Other mums and dad would have wondered why the dogs alerted been distraught at this happening, thinking the worst possible outcome for their daughter.

Not Kate and Gerry McCann - they went into self protect mode!

Gerry McCann said cadaver dogs are incredibly unreliable - he wishes!

And Kate McCann had this to say of the reconstruction :

The proposed reconstruction: 

The suggestion of a reconstruction of our movements and other key witnesses at the crime scene and/or surrounding area in the early days following Madeleine's abduction was declined by the PJ as 'not usual' for Portugal. When the PJ finally requested a reconstruction to take place in 2008, Gerry and I were still arguidos and as such would have attended for a reconstruction. Some key witnesses (including some of our friends) declined to attend the planned reconstruction as they were NOT CONVINCED of the aims and usefulness of it. In particular, as the reconstruction was not to be shown to the media (and hence the general public), THEY did not feel it would help to find Madeleine. Had the intention been to show it to the general public, it may have 'jogged' memories and encouraged people to come forward with information. It should be added that other key witnesses were not invited to attend.


END  

Oh well that's okay then Kate's buddies didn't feel it would help Madeleine.

'
Sorry Maddie mummy, daddy and our buddies, don't see the point in helping you today, better luck next time poppet...'


How can any mother of a missing child dismiss in such an offhand way crucial evidence, and AGREE the non co-operation of her buddies in assisting the police, which might have helped her missing child?  


IT IS NOT NATURAL OR NORMAL TO SUPPORT THOSE WHO FAILED AND REFUSED TO HELP YOUR MISSING CHILD.    

Again Kate McCann gave NOTHING for Madeleine.  Her support lay with her dodgy buddies.



And of the cadaver dogs Kate McCann said:


The dogs:  

We realise that the behaviour of the dogs was the turning point in the investigation for the PJ.  The use of the dogs has proved to be problematic and unreliable in previous cases.  


NOT THESE DOGS, KATE AND GERRY McCANN - EDDIE AND KEELA WERE 100% CORRECT IN OVER 200 CASES.

If these dogs are problematic - ONLY FOR YOU, KATE AND GERRY McCANN.  Only problematic for you!


And when she discovered that she had been caught out over the lies they had told regarding the window and shutters being jemmied, having phoned home to tell these lies to her family and friends (you can view members of her family stating what Kate McCann wrongly told them on that night on the Richard Hall DVD's no escaping her lies, her family sit there large as life and repeat what Kate McCann told them.  Kate McCann had this to say:

The Window:

I described to the police exactly what I found that night, as it was and is highly relevant and I knew that every little detail could be helpful in finding my daughter which is our only aim.   The window which is a ground floor window was completely open and is large enough for a person to easily climb through it.  Whether it had been opened for this purpose remains unknown.   It could of course have been opened by the perpetrator when inside the apartment as a potential escape route or left open as a 'red herring.'

END

So Kate McCann now asks us to believe AFTER refusing to assist police with their investigations, not answering questions, and AFTER supporting her buddies in NOT helping her missing child in doing a reconstruction of events, to believe that she honestly FELT  that every little detail was helpful to finding her daughter.

This is the mother who REFUSED TO SUPPLY OVER 40 LITTLE DETAILS, by REFUSING TO ANSWER THE 40 + police questions put to her and when asked if she understood this would be detrimental to finding her daughter, she replied 'if that is what the investigation thinks':

THAT'S ONE POOR EXCUSE FOR A MOTHER FOR ANY CHILD TO BE BURDENED WITH!

 A mother who did NOT:

  • Search for her child
  • Answer Police questions
Who
  • Dissed the dogs
  • Spoke ill of officers, the very first police officers who arrived on the scent that night.  The Police officers who drove her to the police station the following day. And all other officers thereafter.
  • And who fed the world the most outrageous story of abduction the world has ever heard, and will most likely never here its like again.
  • Kept from the public for over five years the e.fits of a suspect.  The suspect now the centre of the Met Police Investigation.
How unlucky could one child get?

The above paragraph in red, demonstrates the devious mind of Kate McCann, her every word in that paragraph, in particular and the others also, ALL to protect them, to take the story 'elsewhere' cover their tracks.

The one that makes me laugh most, and would be hilariously funny if we did not know she is speaking of her daughter's mysterious disappearance - and after having been found to have LIED ABOUT THOSE SHUTTERS BEING JEMMIED is:

'THAT THE WINDOW AND SHUTTERS WERE OPENED BY THE PERPETRATOR AS A 'RED HERRING.'

'What is funny about it is, it is probably the only true words this woman has spoken.'

'The window and shutters were opened by the perpetrator'

The police did say ONLY Kate McCanns fingerprints were found at the window area?  And Professor Barclay that top British forensic guy, he was of the opinion the crime scene was staged!

Forget abductors, bin men, tractormen, smelly men, long haired men, and everyone else we are expected to believe were hanging around that apartment block that night and NEVER seen by anyone.   Before this case can move anywhere, the stories by the McCanns and their buddies must be tackled, as they are not truthful.

They absolutely MUST take part in a re-enactment of events - but we know that will never take place.

Has DCI Redwood done that - TACKLED THEIR LIES?  If he has, he then has a lot of explaining to do for the UK public whose tax is paying for this investigation.

  • He could start by telling them WHY Gerry McCann changed his story.

  • And why Kate McCann phoned home and told everyone her family members those shutters had been jemmied when they had not.

  • And I'm sure everyone would like to know Andy's explanation as to why Fiona Payne, Rachael Oldfield and Jane Tanner the females in the group said that Kate McCann told them at the dinner table she had left the patio door unlocked on the night of 3rd May 2007 for Madeleine to exit that apartment and go find them.

  • And WHY Kate McCann on televised interview gave an ENTIRELY DIFFERENT VERSION?

I fail to see how DCI Redwood could have been ploughing through this case now for over 3 years and not DISCOVERED WHY THE LIES?

He must have seen, in the police files, and heard them, the McCanns, in their own words in interviews - LIE.

If this group of people are not on his suspect list - something seriously wrong at the MET!

Something needs explaining to the public!

I challenge anyone to read those police files, view the McCanns interviews, the lies and inconsistencies, the statements they have made publicly over the years - and not be suspicious of them being involved at some level in the disappearance of this child.

Read blog above 'Kate McCann Back to Zero'

'How could that FIRST gust of wind in the bedroom have caused the door to slam closed - a gust strong enough to do that, yet it took A SECOND gust to blow open the curtains?'

That FIRST gust we are to believe left the curtains in a closed position, not even gently blowing in the wind when there was an open window and shutter.

I guess though Kate likes a bit of drama.  She was supposedly outside the door, holding the door handle when it slammed shut (yeah!) she couldn't see the window then could she.  For to add to her slamming door story, a story about whooshing curtains, it required a SECOND GUST OF WIND.

Who is she kidding!   Herself obviously, because no one else is buying it!

Ask yourselves also, WHY did Kate McCann when this gust blew the door closed, not look to the window, the obvious thing to do?   SHE DIDN'T.

She said she looked over her shoulder to see if she had closed the patio door behind her?

This was not her original story though, this was one of the embellished versions.

Do remember in McCann world - there is always more than one version of events.

Lost count how many they have told thus far!

Doesn't add up Kate McCann!



l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com
14th August 2014

Website Builder