Lying in the Sun

Monster Mum?

Monster Mums?



'The night that our little girl was taken from her bed, we mistakenly presumed that some kind of alert would have gone out immediately to the public, to get as many eyes and ears involved in the search as possible.'



Kate McCann
Mumsnet


I think we all know that Kate McCann did NOT on the night she reported her child as missing THINK FOR A SPLIT SECOND that an alert of some kind would go out IMMEDIATELY TO THE PUBLIC, to get as many eyes and ears involved in the search as possible.

We all know the stories Kate McCann told then and has been telling for the past 8 years and NONE involved her thinking that an IMMEDIATE alert to the public would go out.

What a shed load of shit from her once again.  

What she did say in those early days was that she had no idea that so many children went missing, not a mention of any child alert scheme.


This is the female, the mum WHO DID NOT go out and search at all for her child on the night she/they reported her missing or on ANY OTHER, no it was TOO DARK she said to search, so her and Gerry McCann went to bed.   So while her little daughter may have been trapped somewhere outside, cold, terrified, waiting for her mummy and daddy to come find her, mummy and daddy were tucked up cosy in bed.

Kate and Gerry McCann were NOT down at the cop shop either asking if ANY ALERT HAD GONE OUT TO THE PUBLIC TO GET THEM SEARCHING!

The pair of them are a joke, not that anyone finds their antics and actions funny, more a disgrace.

It sounds good though doesn't it when she is promoting a child alert system to come up with a story such as this, that she thought the public would be immediately alerted so that they could spring into action and start searching, keep their eyes and ears open while her and Gerry got some kip!

It is interesting that in interviews Kate McCann always speaks of her daughter as having been abducted, or as in the above statement, having been taken from her bed.

The world knows that since the child was reported as missing, not one shred of evidence has been discovered to establish that the child was abducted or taken from her bed.

We have only the word of the McCanns that any abduction took place. Their fancy lawyer in Court in UK was forced to admit, after referring to Madeleine's disappearance as abduction, for which she could provide NO PROOF to support such a statement, that she too had ONLY the word of the McCanns!  Court ruled that without proof, she could not then refer to the child's disappearance as abduction

Indeed we all have heard the various versions told by the McCanns their ever changing stories about what happened on the night they reported Madeleine as missing.  And quite a collection of tales it is!

What has remained constant in their stories is that they say she was taken from her bed.

Madeleine was a little girl who we are told often woke in the night (at home in the UK the family had a star chart, whereby if she woke in the night, and DID NOT leave her bed to go to her parents bedroom she was rewarded with a star! )  On this vacation McCanns said that more than once the child got out of bed and came to them in their bedroom to alert them to the crying of her younger siblings.   McCanns say sometimes they attended to the younger ones, but on one occasion they did NOT go through to attend to the twin tots who were crying.

Often I have wondered why they did not attend to these little ones, so cruel to have ignored their cries!

On the night they reported Madeleine as missing, and on their independent checks of their children, both Kate and Gerry McCann claimed that when they saw the bedroom door more open than they had left it, that they thought Madeleine had gotten out of bed.

NEITHER of these parents thought for a split second that anyone had 'taken the child from her bed'  their first thoughts were that Madeleine had gotten up out of bed and had gone to their bedroom.

And that is exactly what the parents of a child prone to waking and wandering would think on seeing the bedroom door more open, that their child had done exactly that, gotten out of bed and wandered to their bedroom.  

At home in the UK Madeleine would wake in the night.  On vacation in Portugal, unlike at home where she had her own bedroom, she shared a bedroom with the two little ones.   Little ones who cried in the night and woke Madeleine, a child already not the best at sleeping throughout the night.

So what I find quite astonishing is that whilst the McCanns in their story, each thought Madeleine had gotten out of bed and wandered each thinking she had gone through to their bedroom, they STILL tell the story of how Madeleine was TAKEN FROM HER BED.

(truth be told we only have the McCanns word that the Madeleine was abducted and we only have their word that she was put to bed at a time they claimed she was.  And their 'word' we know from following this case cannot be trusted)

Now, lets pretend Madeleine was abducted.

  • How would they know that any abductor took the child from her bed?  
  • How do they know the child had not gotten out of bed BEFORE an abductor arrived and had taken herself off to their bedroom as was usual for her to do?  
  • How do they know the child was not removed from THEIR bed/room?  
  • How do they know the child had not gotten out of bed and was pottering around the apartment when the abductor arrived?

It is interesting this 'taken from her bed' business.

DCI Redwood in his far fetched tale of a burglar carrying off the child, did he think she was 'taken her from her bed?'

I would think not!

If Madeleine was in bed in the dark room (or not so dark room, depending on which of the McCann versions of the tale you wish to believe) WHY would any burglar take her from her bed?   For what reason would a burglar do this?  NONE that makes any sense.  

If she had gotten out of bed before the arrival of this burglar WHY would he carry her off, dead or alive?

It's a nonsense.

In the various versions given by the McCanns in interviews and statements, they have said Madeleine was tucked up UNDER the bedclothes/that she was lying sleeping on top of the bedclothes as it was a warm night.  They have also described the night as being very cold, windy.  We have heard Gerry McCann speak of his check, how Madeleine was lying in the very position as when he had LEFT her that evening that she had not moved an inch from the position he had left her ON TOP of the bedclothes.

The McCanns despite all of their various versions, wish us to believe that an abductor took Madeleine from her bed.

It does not tie in at all with DCI Redwoods tale of a burglary gone wrong (but then his story is as far fetched as theirs)

The one part of the McCanns tale that I do not discount is that this little girl was possibly lying on 'A' bed just prior to being removed from the apartment.

But it is WHO removed her that is the BIG question.   

Certainly not a burglar, and not an abductor!

Why not?

  • Because the facts of this case provide NO EVIDENCE of abduction.  They tell a quite different story.
  • The facts of this case provide NO EVIDENCE that the apartment was broken into.
  • Because a most crucial fact of this case is that the McCanns and their buddies have TOLD TOO MANY TALES, and for that to have happened, the real story, the truth has to have been hidden. Quite simply, if they had been honest, completely truthful from the outset, then there would NOT be so many different versions.

I think there is every possibility Madeleine was removed, taken from from A bed within that apartment.   A bed on which the child was laid after being discovered injured/dead.   The bed from which she was later removed.

Kate McCann in one interview stated that ' you don't expect your child to be taken from your bed.'   Not from HER bed (the child's bed) but from your bed, as in, from Kate McCanns bed.

Was Madeleine laid on her parents bed until such times that she was to be taken, to a place where her body would be concealed?

Oldfield told his tale of how he only saw the twin children.   We are told too that he popped his head round the door of the parents bedroom.   Why would he do that, and not do likewise in the room he said he believed Madeleine was asleep?  After all he was there to check on them he said.  Why check the parents bedroom for the child and not the bedroom where he believed she would be sleeping?

(And the most obvious red alert with Oldfield is why in hell was he ever in that apartment at all doing visual checks when not even the McCann parents did visual checks of their kids  -  what lies this lot have spun)

This child was surely taken from that apartment but the evidence suggests it is MORE LIKELY she was taken by a member of the McCann group/someone known to them, than any stranger abductor, and most definitely not by a burglar.

But interesting to see that Kate McCann is not only pedaling for the Missing People Charity, but that she is still peddling her 'Madeleine was taken from her bed'  tale.

Kate McCann (in reference to the non existent child alert system):

'Vital time was lost in the search for Madeleine.  We will never know the difference this could have made.'


Indeed we will never know.  How can we consider how things COULD have, MIGHT have turned out when based on a non existent alert system?

Based on what we DO KNOW, certainly we can surmise, speculate how things might have turned out.

  • Had one or both parents searched that night, and throughout that night for their little girl arguably that might have made ALL the difference.  Had the little one wandered off, trapped somewhere, or afraid hiding in the cold night, to hear her parents call her name, could have made all the difference.

  • Had Jane Tanner, Fiona Payne, Rachael Oldfield the three females who claim to have discussed, Tanner having seen a man carry off a child, but who all failed to immediately tell the police or the McCanns of this, now that could have made a difference to any search had this been brought to attention immediately.

But most of all in this case, -


  • HAD the McCanns, NOT LEFT three little tots alone night after scary night, in an UNLOCKED holiday apartment (which is their story) it would for sure have MADE A DIFFERENCE!

Had these people NOT IGNORED their daughter when she told them that she and her baby brother had been crying, calling out for their parents the night previous to Madeleine being reported as missing, and done what ALL responsible caring parents would do and NOT ONCE AGAIN WALK OUT AND  LEAVE THE KIDS IN SUCH A DANGEROUS AND VULNERABLE POSITION (and that is the story they want us to believe) It would for sure have MADE A DIFFERENCE.

  • The difference being that Madeleine McCann would for sure be alive today, living the life that should have been hers to live.
  • The difference being that the McCann twins would for sure be living a quite different life from what they are living.   A life where their parents, who one minute want to shut the press up and the next court it, telling the world what these twins say and do, and include them also in their documentaries.
  • The difference being the twins would not now be living a life that will never truly be theirs.  As thing stand these kids live a life based on the abhorrent actions of their parents.  A life in the shadow of Madeleine, in the glare of the public eye, as that is what their parents court.  These kids have no choice, their parents need, their obsession with getting noticed, to constantly be in the media and paying so that this may happen, has resulted in the twins living lives that are not theirs and theirs alone, but lives where they must always share with Madeleine, a sister they never knew, they have to play out what should have been Madeleine's life together with what should have been their own. Living lives that will never truly be theirs.   So sad.
In the case of children genuinely abducted, missing, it is understandable that the parents would not wish for the missing child to be forgotten.

But life is for the living, and any siblings of a missing child must be allowed to live their own life.

Kate and Gerry McCann could so easily make life so much easier for these twins by not courting the attention and publicity which they do.

For Kate McCann to have written 'Madeleine' supposedly an account of the truth said she, but filled with matters of a sexual nature, which she sold to the press and she and he posed for ridiculous pictures too, to promote the nonsense, it is not what the McCann twins needed.  Far from it.   It is one thing for the story of their missing sister to be in the press, quite another when their parents behave so disgustingly, knowing their twin children would see and hear of this.

Kate McCann made such a fuss over a book Dr Amaral wrote, a book of facts from the police investigation, she claimed her son heard of this book when travelling on the school bus, that the radio was on.  UTTER NONSENSE.

Yet her book, splattered on every newspaper, she herself being interviewed up and down the country, appearing on UK TV, her book on sale in the UK, how could her twin children not have heard of this, headlines such as how she could not get in the sack with Gerry McCann.

Yeah that's just what little kids need to hear, see, and be reminded of at school, their parents bedroom antics or lack of.   

Don't they just want to make you throw up what they do to these twin kids.

They have got to go down on record in the top ten of IRRESPONSIBLE PARENTS ever to have lived. 

In the Madeleine case when so much points to the parents involvement in their daughter's disappearance, when the parents continually court media attention, and when in fact we know they have paid Clarence Mitchell from Madeleine's Search Fund, monies donated by the public, £hundreds of thousands for his services, to spin whatever tale necessary, and when we know it has been reported they paid £500,000 to keep them on the front pages for a year, and when they continually bring their twin children to the attention of the public, we know for SURE that these twin children are not being allowed to live their OWN lives in the way that children should.   Their right to this is clearly being denied, overridden by the parents lust for centre stage it would seem.


Gerry and Kate McCann are all about ME, ME, ME, AND MORE ME!  

To hell with the twins how these sickening displays affect their lives, their lives with their school friends.

Kate McCann, this mum, who to most kids will now be seen as the scary monster mum and not only for her vivid stories and her book Madeleine - being an ambassador for a missing children's charity, the irony is not lost.  If I was a missing child, the last person I would want on the end of any telephone line, the last person I would want to know is involved in any way in my "rescue" - is Kate McCann or any of her holiday buddies, from the scary bunch...

Kate McCann is 


  • The mum who left her three little ones alone in a dark scary holiday apartment night after night. 
  • A mum who said her little girl TOLD her she and her baby brother had been crying, yet still left the children to fend for themselves.
  • A mother who sat in a bar and told her buddies of this, and told them of how she had left the door unlocked for Madeleine to get out onto the street to go look for them
  • The mum who wishes a now retired police officer to feel miserable to feel fear, the same fear she inflicted on her three children night after night?
  • The mum who wanted Robert Murat dead
  • The mum who did not fully co-operate with police
  • The mum who is known to have told many a tall tale shall we say, in connection with the disappearance of her daughter.

In her piece for Mumsnet, speaking of this sponsored cycle she tell us:

"And I will be away from my twins for five whole days!"

As opposed to the FIVE NIGHTS that she left them alone in the dark scary holiday apartment?

Oddly she tells us of how difficult the cycle will be the miles and the hills, the hills and the miles, then she threw in rather randomly that she would be away from her twins.

Are we to take from this that she will miss them, or was she just stating a fact, same as she did at the dinner table on the night Madeleine was reported as missing, when she told her buddies (
according to the statement given to police by best buddie Fiona Payne) that she was away from the three kids, but had left the patio door of the apartment unlocked for Madeleine to get out?

Payne incidentally will be joining Kate McCann on this cycle event.

STILL THE PAIR HAVE NOT COME CLEAN AS TO WHICH OF THEM IF ANY, TOLD THE TRUTH REGARDING PAYNE'S STATEMENT TO LEICESTERSHIRE POLICE IN THE UK WHERE SHE INFORMED THEM THAT KATE McCANN SAID SHE LEFT THE PATIO DOOR UNLOCKED SO THAT MADELEINE COULD LEAVE THE APARTMENT ON HER OWN.

SHOCKING ISN'T IT.  THAT FIONA PAYNE WOULD MAKE SUCH A DAMNING STATEMENT TO POLICE AND NO ONE QUESTIONS THE PAIR AS TO WHICH OF THEM IS BEING TRUTHFUL.

YET HERE WE HAVE THE PAIR OF THEM CYCLING ON BEHALF OF A MISSING PERSONS CHARITY, AND ASKING THE PUBLIC TO FINANCIALLY BACK THEM.

I RATHER THINK THE PUBLIC WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER TO THE QUESTION -

DID FIONA PAYNE LIE TO POLICE ABOUT KATE McCANN, OR DID KATE McCANN LIE ON THE TUBRIDY SHOW WHEN SHE CONTRADICTED THE STATEMENT BY PAYNE?


I RATHER THINK THE PUBLIC WOULD NOT WISH TO SUPPORT THIS PAIR IF THEY DISCOVERED THAT THERE IS A HUGE DISCREPANCY IN THEIR STORIES THAT THEY HAVE NOT BEEN TRUTHFUL IN THEIR ACCOUNT AS TO THE NIGHT THEY REPORTED MADELEINE AS A MISSING CHILD.

SHOCKING THAT THEY ASK THE PUBLIC TO SPONSOR THEM WHEN QUITE OBVIOUSLY THE TRUTH OF MATTERS HAS NOT AS YET BEEN ESTABLISHED AS TO WHO IS BEING TRUTHFUL

SOMEONE IS NOT TELLING THE TRUTH IN THE CASE OF A MISSING CHILD!

AND PERSONS WHO ARE NOT TRUTHFUL IN THE CASE OF A MISSING CHILD, A POLICE INVESTIGATION, SHOULD ABSOLUTELY NOT BE PLAYING A PART IN ANY FUND RAISING FOR ANY CHARITY, AND CERTAINLY NOT A CHARITY FOR MISSING PEOPLE AND MISSING CHILDREN.

IT IS A QUITE UNBELIEVABLE SITUATION.

I WOULD GO SO FAR AS TO SAY THAT THE PUBLIC BEING KEPT IN THE DARK WITH REGARDS SUCH A SITUATION, AND WHO THEN DONATE TO SAID FUND, ARE BEING DUPED!

Missing People this charity, surely it is duty bound when such information is freely available, to ensure the honesty and integrity of those they choose to represent the charity, more so when they are asking the public to assist and support them financially?

The name McCann, attached to any charity or body involved with missing people, in particular missing children is more than concerning, it will always cause controversy.

Whilst the McCanns claim is that they have been cleared of all involvement in the disappearance of their daughter, that is not in fact the case.

They certainly have not been charged with any criminal offence at this time, but that is quite a different matter from declaring that they were cleared of any involvement.

Their arguido status was dropped as the case was being shelved, not closed as some believed at the time, but shelved pending new credible information.  I believe that is the law in Portugal.  When a case is shelved, arguido status is dropped.   Happy to be corrected.

Kate McCann in this piece for Mumsnet is implying that a non existent alert system may have helped Madeleine.  

They'll spin any story in their favour and for whatever is their agenda.

Now if she had said there was an alert system which was for some reason not operating that evening, then fire away and ponder what might have been.

To ponder what might have been about something that never existed?

They did this with the child checking scheme.  Harped on about a NON EXISTENT checking scheme.  Harped on about other countries having one, other resorts.

As Judge Judy would say - she could have been a model if 6 inches taller.

That is how ridiculous is her story.

Just as she has claimed, implied that the Portuguese Police and just about everyone else, with exception of her and Gerry McCann of course are responsible for Madeleine never being traced.

Their arrogance is astonishing.

We have of course yet to hear her blaming the Metropolitan Police for not having found Madeleine, and they have been pussyfooting around for over 4 years now through files which were handed to them on a plate. 30,000 records which the Portuguese put together within 6 months, and the Met are still plodding 4 + years later?

Now why would that be.  Why would Kate and Gerry McCann not be complaining about the Met, still on the job for more than 4 years?

Had Portuguese been on the case for years, hell can you imagine the outcry from Team McCann. 

And the Met have yet to find this petty burglar who they say may have removed the child from the apartment.  

Now how hard would it be to track down a local petty thief and break him down in interview, to persuade him to tell the truth.   About 2 minutes I reckon!

One would need to go far to find a dodgier case than the case of missing Madeleine McCann.

Kate McCann and Fiona Payne as riders in this sponsored cycle, where they are representing a missing persons charity and where they are asking the public to donate should come clean, but up front and open, explain to the public whose money they are once again asking, why they have GIVEN DIFFERENT ACCOUNTS OF THE NIGHT MADELEINE VANISHED WITHOUT TRACE.

Fiona Payne should stand up and be counted and tell the public WHY she gave the statement she did regarding Kate McCann and the unlocked patio door

Kate McCann should stand up and be counted and tell the public WHY she gave the statement she did regarding the unlocked patio when being interviewed on Tubridy Show.

THEIR ACCOUNTS ARE POLES APART.

FLOORS ALL YOURS KATE AND FIONA.  

500 MILES TO EACH SEARCH YOUR CONSCIENCE.

500 MILES TO THINK OF MADELEINE WHAT BECAME OF HER.

500 MILES TO REFLECT ON THE STORIES YOU HAVE EACH TOLD.

500 MILES TO DO THE RIGHT THING. 

WHEN YOU REACH THE TOWER OF LONDON PERHAPS YOU WILL BE READY TO TELL THE TRUTH - FOR MADELEINE, AND ALL OF THOSE OTHER MISSING PERSONS WHO YOU CLAIM TO BE AIDING.

READY TO TELL THE PUBLIC IF FIONA PAYNE'S POLICE WITNESS STATEMENT WAS HONEST, AND IF SO, THEN KATE McCANNS CLAIMS WERE NOT, AND VICE VERSA.

The paying public deserve honesty.

Madeleine, and persons missing deserve honesty!

The children of the tapas group deserve honesty, not monster mums!

'Vital time was lost in the search for Madeleine'

Indeed it was, EIGHT YEARS TOO LATE for Madeleine, EIGHT YEARS of suffering for this child if alive and with paedophiles.   EIGHT YEARS when NONE of the McCann party co-operated with police, ALL refusing to take part in a reconstruction to assist them.

EIGHT YEARS Kate McCann and Fiona Payne have stayed schtum about the TRUTH OF WHAT WAS SAID AT THAT DINNER TABLE.

EIGHT YEARS is a long time to have continued not to help Madeleine, the case of her disappearance.



l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com
13th June 2015


Website Builder