Lying in the Sun

NO Brainer McCann Kids..

No Brainer - McCanns Kids Horribly, Cruelly, Neglected...

                                That is according to their parents..!




Dress it up however they want.  Debate it for however long they want.  They have stated they left their 3 under 4 year old kids alone FIVE nights on trot.  Popping back and forth so they claim to the vacation apartment to 'LISTEN' for crying - nothing more!   

  • They did not pop back to look in on their kids - NO siree!  According to them it was just to LISTEN FOR CRYING!
  • They did not pop back to look in on their kids to make sure ALL THREE were actually still in bed, OR still in the apartment - NO siree!  According to them it was just to LISTEN FOR CRYING!

ALL THREE children might have 'LEFT' the apartment.  ALL THREE children might have been lying DEAD in the apartment.  But McCanns weren't popping in and out of the apartment to check if their kids were still there, still alive - NO SIREE!

According to the outrageous tale by the now infamous Drs McCann - they were only INTERESTED IN CRYING!

Now ain't that a MYSTERY then BECAUSE, BECAUSE, BECAUSE what d'ya know - According also to the good, or not so good Doctors their daughter Madeleine told them on the morning of 3rd May 2007 (the child was reported as missing late night of 3rd May 2007) that she and her baby brother had the previous evening (Wednesday 2nd May 2007) BEEN CRYING!


And guess what?  On that very same morning Madeleine asked the slippery doctor duo, who she had the misfortune to have as parents - 'WHY DIDN'T YOU COME WHEN ME AND SEAN CRIED LAST NIGHT?' (yeah that IS what I think of them, and YES these kids deserve/d so much better than to have this pair for parents. Stick that in your pipe and smoke it all those who have turned a blind eye to the fate of this child in favour of fawning over a couple slippery chancers who wouldn't know the truth if it jumped up and bit them on the ass, McCann kids didn't,and don't deserve parents that treated them so cruelly) -


(have to say this little tale by McCanns varies.  Sometimes Gerry McCann cannot remember which of his kids were crying, Sean has a twin sister, so these two kids, in McCannland become interchangeable - sometimes we'll hear that the female twin was crying, sometimes the male twin BUT ALWAYS MADELEINE WAS CRYING - because, because, because, Madeleine being the eldest at 3 years old was the only one they could use to play the lead role in this tale of theirs - the younger ones would not have been able to articulate such a story over breakfast on the morning of 3rd May 2007.  And would I be too much of a cynic to say that Dr Kate and Dr Gerry invented this little tale, to plant the idea that THE BIG BAD INTRUDER had made a house call, uninvited of course, the night previous to the Doctors McCann reporting Madeleine as GONE?   Well, let's be blunt - NO I WOULDN'T!  Because, because, because - JUST ABOUT EVERY STORY they have come up with, is EXACTLY THAT - Just a tale they have COME UP WITH!   Interchangeable kids, interchangeable stories!  Dr Kate thinks the children must have been woken by the BIG BAD INTRUDER THE previous night!  And wouldn't she just have loved if the world had swallowed that one whole!  How have this pair gotten away with this crap for so long?)

But back to this INTEREST they had in CRYING CHILDREN.  As soon as they discovered their children had been CRYING - they did what?

NOTHING to be precise! NOTHING!  Absolutely NOTHING!


So the question one must ask is WHY NOTHING?


And the other question must be WHY DID THEY BOTHER TO LISTEN FOR CRYING AT ANY TIME THEN if when they were told about CRYING it meant NOTHING to them?

IN FACT - when they heard of this CRYING - they WENT OUT TO THE BAR WITH THEIR BUDDIES AS THEY HAD DONE THE PREVIOUS FOUR NIGHTS, LEAVING THE KIDS ALONE?

How come?


Seriously ALL you parents out there who SUPPORT what these two docs did to their three little kids - HOW COME?


They said they knew the kids had cried - SO WHY DID THEY GO OUT AGAIN AND LEAVE THEM?

TAKES A CRUEL BASTARD TO DO THAT TO KIDS - OR TWO IN THIS CASE.

DON'T HAVE A SINGLE FRIEND WHO IS A PARENT WHO WOULD:

(a) be so cruel to leave kids in this way.
(b) be so cruel as to leave them knowing they had been crying

I find that just too awful for words it doesn't to me bear thinking about to walk out and leave kids, and to know they would be afraid, just tears you apart.

So NO I will never understand the cruelty towards the McCann children, the cruelty their parents have told police, and the world they carried out. 

They might prefer to not refer to it as child neglect, but rather call it 'responsible parenting' but that just shows how cruel and cowardly they are not facing up to what they did, hiding behind their lawyers!

Poor Madeleine must have been terrified, and that some gloss over this, the child's suffering, is incomprehensible to me.

But guess what else? THEY CLAIM TO HAVE LEFT THE DOOR UNLOCKED ON THAT NIGHT!

So let's get this straight.


They leave their THREE kids, all under the age of 4 years old, in a dark and scary vacation apartment alone.  Kids who the doctors McCann said HAD woken up of an evening (Madeleine having to go through to her parents room to wake them alert them to the crying of the little ones.  So these parents KNEW the chances of these kids waking when they were out and about was HIGH) kids who they KNEW were crying the night BEFORE they reported Madeleine as missing Yet off they popped out again with their buddies.

SO THEY REALLY WERE NOT INTERESTED IN CRYING?

Bear in mind also, Kate McCann said Madeleine was not quite herself that evening.  The child was tired, pale, had to be carried home to the apartment after having tea with the other kids.

And something which the Doctors McCann have NEVER explained as far as I can see, but happy to stand corrected.

We have heard Kate McCanns tale of how she entered through the unlocked patio door EVERY VERSION, and there are a few!

But in one, she states she slid open the patio door, and just stood inside to LISTEN FOR CRYING.   


(
she had no INTENTION to go over to the children's bedroom, take a little look inside, make sure the tired, pale Madeleine was okay, hadn't become unwell, or that the twin kids were okay, she states this also in the video clip)

What we have NEVER to my knowledge heard either of them describe IS on all of those other evenings when they entered by the front locked door using their key - I have to say Gerry McCann told Portuguese Police in his first witness statement that he and his wife did this EVERY night entered by the front locked door, BUT he changed  his story SEVEN days after his daughter vanished!   OOOOh I wonder why?   From WHERE did they LISTEN FOR CRYING?


In Kate McCanns story she only intended listening from just inside the patio door entrance.

  • But when they entered from the front door?  Was it usual for them to simply unlock the FRONT door step inside, and stand at the front entrance to listen for crying?
  • Did they go further inside and stand just outside the bedroom door?

And if they did - WHY would Kate McCann not have done likewise - stood outside the bedroom door after entering by the patio door?


And why would any parent who had gone to an apartment to check on their kids NOT do exactly that CHECK ON THEM?   



Standing at a patio door, a front door, outside a bedroom door, IS NOT what one would consider to be 'checking that kids are safe and well.'


How the hell can you check if you don't see them?

Now perhaps if you were at home, had put kids to bed, later popping upstairs, one might just listen as you pass the kids bedroom door.


But when you are in a foreign country, and you have left three little tots alone in a vacation apartment, kids who told you they had been crying when alone, kids who had asked you 'WHY DID YOU NOT COME WHEN WE CRIED?'  And you had DELIBERATELY LEFT a patio door unlocked -  WHY OH WHY would you NOT check to see, do a visual check establish that all kids were STILL THERE?  THAT ALL KIDS WERE ALIVE?


It makes no sense!  And I know some hate that I refer to Judge Judy, but hell the woman is right when she said - 'if it makes no sense, it's generally a lie.'


On other hand parents who could walk out on kids when they knew they had been crying, parents who could leave three tots alone in an apartment - MAYBE to them, not doing a visual check was NORMAL.


And if that is the story they are telling us - and it is - then they were/are ABSOLUTELY NOT FIT to have children in their care!


  • And as the McCanns have carefully avoided describing from where exactly they positioned themselves to LISTEN FOR CRYING when entering by the FRONT LOCKED DOOR
  • And ALSO have carefully AVOIDED stating WHICH NIGHT they changed this routine, from entering by the FRONT LOCKED DOOR to entering by the side/back/patio door.
  • And carefully avoided also explaining THEIR REASON for the change of routine -  BIG RED FLAG - BIG FAT LIE.


Oh Gerry McCann did in his little rehearsed piece with the despicable Dr Matthew Oldfield in their ridiculous conversation which was part of their even more dodgy account of the events of the evening the child vanished - 'we stopped coming in the front door because of the noise, didn't want to wake the kids' he said?


WHAT NOISE?


IF as he ALSO stated his kids NEVER woke at all on any night when they left them.   That his kids NEVER at any time woke on ANY OF THEIR checks - which they have both stated...


THEN WHAT NOISE?


IF NO NOISE HAD EVER CAUSED THE KIDS TO WAKE,  THEN AS THEY SAY -, IF IT AIN'T BROKE DON'T FIX IT!




WHY WOULD THEY CHANGE ROUTINE IF NOTHING HAPPENED, IF NO CHILD HAD WOKEN UP WHEN THEY WERE CHECKING?


And more obviously IF ANY CHILD had been awake, crying, or both - YOU DON'T CHANGE ROUTINE as in, you don't just change which door you use -


YOU DARN WELL CHANGE YOUR ROUTINE FROM GOING OUT AND LEAVING THE KIDS ALONE TO - STAYING AT HOME AND LOOKING AFTER THEM, PROTECTING THEM.


Do I believe their story?

In answer: - 

Are Kate and Gerry McCann honest people. devout Roman Catholics?


As to the article in the Daily Mail like the TALL TALE the McCanns have spun re their daughter's disappearance - leaving little kids alone - is a no brainer - just not debatable!


And the guy who claims to have left his kids in an apartment when on holiday and who conveniently mentions McCanns and has similar story - dig deep enough and no doubt you will find he is probably in cahoots with Mitchell at some level!


The only reason any of these parents who have treated their kids cruelly have gotten away with it is because they ALL got LUCKY their kids didn't survive through good parenting, and had something happened to their kids they would not be so smart to tell the stories they now do.


The biggest danger to kids, the kids in the stories in the Mail (and especially the McCann kids) IS/WAS THEIR IRRESPONSIBLE SELFISH UNCARING PARENTS!


When you have parents spouting nonsense that it's character building to leave little ones alone increasing gradually over time the length of time they are left alone - that it gives them independence, it is utter crap.  Little kids (I'm not talking teenage kids) need to be looked after, and if people are not prepared to do that act responsibly keep their kids safe - if they don't want a 'family life' with kids, then don't have them!


Kids need to feel safe, secure, loved.   The responsibilities of an adult should NEVER be thrust upon a child.  JUST NOT ON!  


As to the McCanns and checking their kids on that holiday.  They and their buddies all lied to police.


See 'Just Checking' blogs above.


To lie they had a reason.   


The fact that they required the assurance of a solicitor, (or so they say, could be another piece of Mitchell spin, maybe they never spoke to a solicitor at allCannot think that any solicitor knowing the full statements they have made, i.e. what Madeleine told them over breakfast, their decision to then leave the kids again, to decide also to leave a door unlocked, and of course GERRY discovering that someone had been in the apartment and then walking out on them.  I ask you - What solicitor of sound mind would tell them that was ALL withing bounds of responsible parenting?) to tell them that they had acted within the bound of responsible parenting - tells us either that they DIDN'T act responsibly, and/or they were 'enquiring' shall we say, so as to decide which was the best way to proceed with their tale.  How much could they admit to before before charged with child neglect perhaps?


This pair were on the ball from the beginning, hiring this solicitor, and that solicitor, checking out what they could be charged or arrested for in Portugal.   They didn't mess around - protection THEIR protection top of their agenda!


Good old Uncle Brian Kennedy, Kate McCanns uncle right in there, telling people just to pop their cash in an envelope send it to the McCanns home in Rothley and it would help their fighting fund, their legal fees.


WHY did they think they needed a fighting fund?


And I have said it once and I will say it again:


WHY HAVE PARENTS WHO ARE INNOCENT OF ANY OR ALL INVOLVEMENT IN THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THEIR CHILD, WHO HAVE BEEN HONEST ENTIRELY, NEVER HAVING TOLD A LIE TO ANYONE, ACCORDING TO KATE McCANN ( she stated this whilst actually telling us of a lie she had told?) WHY HAVE THEY, AND DO THEY STILL REQUIRE THE SERVICES OF A PAID LIAR/DECEIVER?


As let's face it, that is what Mitchell is paid for, to lie, to manipulate, to put out false stories, feed the press?


WHY do the McCanns need all of these teams of solicitors?  Press agencies? Paid mouthpieces like Mitchell?


And WHEN do they think they will be able to dispense with his costly service?


£70,000 per year that's one hell of a lot of money for an NHS doctor to be paying out of his salary?  And his wife doesn't work?


  • Do McCanns expect the public to keep donating to the Madeleine Fund to pay Clarence Mitchell's fees? 
  • How long do they expect the public to pay for this guy? 


It's astonishing that people no doubt with little to spare gave to this Fund to help the child but what it is being used for is to keep Clarence Mitchell the deceiver in a nice lifestyle.  Keeps the McCanns protected.


For sure as hell the £70,000 per year they have been paying him all these seven years - IT AIN'T BEEN HELPING MADELEINE!
  

From what I can see, I'd say it's been used to help bury her!


So WHO else after SEVEN years is still funding all of the McCann stunts?  

  • U.K. taxpayers paying for the Metropolitan Investigation/Review.
  • Public paying for Clarence Mitchell.

WHO is paying for all their other campaigns, their hate campaigns against others?  Legal actions?  Expensive hotels, travel?


For instance - BRUNT'S STUNT?  His abhorrent attack on Ms Leyland?   Oh let me guess...


Now that was well planned with Gerry McCann, Gamble, Mitchell, Murdoch, Brunt, and of course Duck Lady and her band of vigilantes.


Wake up world - the Madeleine McCann case STINKS!


Ask yourselves:


  • WHY DO THE McCANNS REQUIRE THE SERVICES OF SCUM LIKE MITCHELL? (Yes I consider him to be scum - people who lie, deceive in the case of a missing child are scum.  And when they accept payment for their deceit, then scum doesn't cover it, lowest of the low.)

Young Madeleine she had little chance of surviving that holiday in Portugal not with parents who treated her as they did!


And after they reported her as missing chances of her being found, her remains being found were non existent!   Those who committed crimes against the child seen to that.

And it was not any burglar, any burglary gone wrong that was the cause of her demise.   And no burglar just happened to be carrying a substance to drug any kids they might come across.  


Only a keystone cop would come up with that ridiculous story, OR cops who have been instructed to 'bury' it!


DCI Redwood - where does he fit in the grand plan?  An honest cop, out to do what is right by Madeleine?


Or one who has been 'instructed?'


Has Redwood swallowed the McCanns story of their checking of their children, their story of keeping their actions within the bounds of responsible parenting?


Of course he hasn't!


It is their story of their checking on these children which makes or breaks this ENTIRE case, and as their story stands at the moment they are up the creek without a paddle but only IF Redwood deals with this.  Deals with a PROPER AND HONEST re-enactment of their movements on that night will he give Madeleine a chance of justice.
   

Crimewatch of October 2014 WAS NOT an honest and true account, that is, it was not in keeping with their police witness statements.  Redwood had to know this, yet he went along with it?


He had to know of the statements the McCanns had given Portuguese Police. He had to know of the many tales they have given in interview and their own documentaries, one contradicting the next, and he had to know that what was being dished up in Crimewatch 2014 in respect of the 'checking of the children' was not truthful.


WHY did he go along with it? 


Some say he is playing the long game.


DO UK police usually spend £m's of taxpayers money in such elaborate traps, traps which span over three and one half years?


At a wild guess, I'd have to say NO!


A Mountie we know, always gets his man.   Do the Met?  


IF they do, how long does it take them?


And the perhaps most relevant, is that DCI Redwood MUST KNOW that the Portuguese Investigation was on the MONEY - NO proof of any abduction having taken place and that Madeleine McCann died on the 3rd May 2007.


The McCanns tale of checking on their kids, and the reason their buddies ALL refused to assist Portuguese Police with a re-enactment, is because their story is a big bundle of brown stuff -  just wouldn't stand up to scrutiny.


If it could have, then those documentaries the McCanns arranged would have kept exactly to the word contained in their police witness statements given to Portuguese Police and Leicestershire Police in the UK - IT DIDN'T!


Their documentaries have far from kept to the 'script' that is their police witness statements.   And only one reason for that being the case - they were NOT honest with police when giving their statements!




l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com
12th November 2014


Website Builder