Lying in the Sun

Silence of McCanns - 2

Silence of the McCanns – 2

 

Again from ‘Madeleine Was Here’ (Video Part 2)

 

Kate McCann discussing the Portuguese Police Files and the Smith Sighting:

 

Kate McCann:

 

The vast bulk of it was in Portuguese. So, we then, had to get it all translated, which probably cost us about £100,000.

 

I don’t believe anybody’s got the motivation that I have and I was desperate to go through this myself, because I knew that I’d be going through it with a fine toothcomb and I have spent months and months and months and months going through it, evenings, weekends.

 

You know, you wanna go through it really, really quickly because I wanted to get all the information I can and know what I can do, to help find her, as quickly as possible.

 

So, obviously, I just worked really hard, just to get through it.

Often, you know, police do say the name’s in the files.
 

It was always there, but you just need other bits of information, really, to come in to basically highlight the name.

 

At the moment, there isn’t a big arrow and an astrix (sic) by the name.



Voice over:

The most likely sighting of Madeleine and her abductor was by Jane Tanner a friend of the McCanns.

In the files, Kate believes another witness statement from an Irish family, describes a very similar sighting to Jane Tanner’s, less than a mile away from the McCann apartment.



Kate McCann:

 

The reason why this is significant is both sightings were given independently.

So, when this family gave their statement they weren’t aware of Jane’s description and there’s actually quite a lot of similarities and it does beg the question, I mean, how many people carry their children on a cold night, not covered, you know, nothing on their arms or their feet, no blanket?

Now, either there’s been two people carrying children that way, who haven’t come forward to eliminate themselves or potentially they’re related.

Voice of Interviewer:

 

But, you think that child is Madeleine?

Kate McCann:

 

I think it’s a good chance it could be Madeleine. Certainly, the description there sounds to me, like Madeleine.

 

END

 

So lots of questions here for Kate McCann to answer.
 

  •    £100,000.00 on translations?  But no money to circulate an E.Fit?



She states no one had the same motivation she had to go through those files.  She wanted to go through them herself as she would do it with a fine tooth comb.  Dave Edgar at the libel trial admitted to not having gone over all of the files which the McCanns had in their possession when employed as the McCann Private Detective. 

Further she states she wanted to go through it very quickly so that she could see what she could do to help find Madeleine as quickly as possible.


  • Did Kate McCann not allow Edgar to be privy to this information in its entirety?


Rather brings not only her ‘motivation’ but her motives into question when we know that all along this mum of three young children, whilst looking through the Portuguese Police Files, claiming she was doing so, so as to bring her missing daughter home as quickly as possible – was at the very same time, burying in her own private files – information in the form of E.Fits which could have been and should have been circulated by whatever means possible. 

Dave Edgar the McCann private detective who played a huge role in bringing us ‘Madeleine Was Here’ knowing this too, he had been passed the report informing him of the E.Fits!

This woman Kate McCann, put on a performance for ‘Madeleine Was Here’ all the while, knowing she had hidden away the E.Fits and was hiding this from the public, deceiving them by not introducing it in the Madeleine Was Here Documentary.

It would not have cost a penny more for her to have included another sentence, to hold up the efits – informing the public of this vital information.

  • Quite simply- Why did she not?

Kate McCann said also with regard to the culprits of crimes:

“Often, you know, police do say the name’s in the files.”

 

“It was always there, but you just need other bits of information, really, to come in to basically highlight the name.”

 

“At the moment, there isn’t a big arrow and an astrix (sic) by the name.

 

I think Kate McCann will soon find that there is indeed an arrow with ‘Gerry and Kate’ on it flying fast forward towards Rothley, and a quiver of arrows with the names of all of those involved in the child’s disappearance heading their way too.

 

The Smith Sighting

 

Kate McCann tells us the two sightings that of the Smith’s and that of Jane Tanner’s are significant as they are independent.  That Smith’s gave their description of the man seen carrying the child without knowing of Jane’s sighting.

 

But there is no Jane ‘sighting’ there never was a ’Jane sighting’ which the McCanns of course knew! 

Jane Tanner in her first outing of her imaginary sighting could not describe the man, nor could she describe what he was carrying if anything.


Gerry McCann too (and I will get the quote, as it is in one of my blogs) says as much.

 

Not until much later (after the Smith family gave their description?) did Tanner become more specific.  Magically she could describe pyjamas identical to those Madeleine was wearing on that night.

Now, if Andy Redwood is saying the child Tanner saw was 2 years of age (2 years younger than Madeleine) it stands to reason from the distance Tanner was from this supposed sighting that there is absolutely no way if she could not describe the man, that she could not possibly describe the pyjamas worn by a little two year old whose legs would most definitely not be dangling over the father’s arms.

 

Kate McCann said:

 

“I mean, how many people carry their children on a cold night, not covered, you know, nothing on their arms or their feet, no blanket?”

Indeed Kate – how many people carry their children on a cold night, nothing on their arms (?) their feet and no blanket?

 

How right she was – but the answer was easy – and Kate knew the answer was - ONLY ONE!   


The one she had hidden in her and Gerry's files!

She continued:

 

“Now, either there’s been two people carrying children that way, who haven’t come forward to eliminate themselves or potentially they’re related.

 

See what she did there? - tried to make ‘two become one and the same!’

Potentially related’ said Kate McCann, when she, Gerry and their companions as did most of us already knew, more importantly the Portuguese Police already knew there was no ‘potentially related’ about it.

The sightings were totally un-related because the one by their pal Tanner was fabricated!

 

The person interviewing, asks Kate McCann if she thinks the child in the sighting could be Madeleine.

 

Kate McCann responds:

 

“I think it’s a good chance it could be Madeleine. Certainly, the description there sounds to me, like Madeleine.

 

 

So she thinks there is a GOOD CHANCE the child was Madeleine, and she thinks the description certainly sounds to her that it was Madeleine...

but

she certainly wasn't prepared to pull out for public viewing those potentially 'life saving'  E. Fits which they had HIDDEN AWAY, and which until recently had been hidden for 5 years?


Five years of Madeleine's young life - the potential, a good chance for her to have been found, for her to have spent those years with her family, and her parents decided to do this to her, to hide information.  Furthermore threatening their own Private Detectives that should they speak of this...


So Madeleine was to be left with the paedophiles then?

And who might that have been to protect, that this child was sacrificed?




Nice parents!

 

 

l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com

27th October 2013

Website Builder