Jiggery pokery has gone on in this case for sure, but I have still yet to be convinced that Madeleine's disappearance was planned in any way in advance of arriving in Portugal.
I do believe the kids were left unattended, and during that time, something terrifying happened to little Madeleine due to the neglect of her parents.
Then followed rushed attempts to conceal what had happened to the little one, to save their own necks, accounting for the many, many lies they have told, ALL OF THEM. It explains their refusals to help the police, their refusals to co-operate in the case of a missing child. In the case of the McCanns their own missing child. In the case of the buddies, the child of their 'friends'
Wayback Machine has been a huge distraction, but I am sure a welcome one for the McCanns, every hour, day, week, month that is spent going round in circles over this nonsense is an hour, day, week, month not talking about the obvious, the disappearance of Madeleine, and that TIMELINE.
The timeline the McCanns and their buddies gave, anyone can see, is lies, invented to protect them all.
The timeline Redwood came up with, anyone can see is lies also, invented for the Met agenda...
Are we still to believe that he was, during his time on this investigation holding out, playing the long game, before he pounced on the real culprits?
I think not. Rather I think he was holding out, playing the long game until he picked up his retirement cheque!
No Officer of the law, about to break, arguably the most well known child disappearance case in the world, steps down, doesn't stick around to take the glory...
The obvious in this case is being ignored, and the obvious is most certainly not the wayback machine.
I cannot claim to know the technology behind it, but logic, common sense, tells me that I'd be foolish to waste precious time over it, that I'd be barking up wrong tree.
What is needed in this case is for the investigating body, the Metropolitan Police to go way back to the beginning, haul in the group of buddies, and do one of those nice little Crimewatch Productions that was done previously re the Madeleine case. Only this time, maybe they could do it properly.
Have the bunch play the parts they did on that night, or have actors play the parts, but the parts MUST BE played to the EXACT letter of their POLICE WITNESS STATEMENTS.
- We have to hear Kate McCanns words when she sat at the dinner table telling Fiona Payne that she had left the patio door unlocked for Madeleine to get out.
- We have to hear Kate McCann ask Fiona Payne what she thought of this.
- We have to hear Rachael Oldfield state how Kate McCann told her at the dinner table that night, of Madeleine and her baby brother crying the previous night when left alone.
- We have to hear Jane Tanner tell the same story, just as she told it to police.
- We have to hear Matthew Oldfield as he stood up, offering Kate McCann to go check on her kids.
- We have to hear Kate McCann tell Matthew Oldfield to go in through the unlocked patio door
- We have to hear Matthew Oldfield tell Gerry McCann that the had listened at the shuttered window without McCanns knowledge
- We have to hear McCanns response to this, as Oldfield said McCann was not happy at this.
We have to hear from Jez Wilkins.
And boy oh boy do we have to hear from CRECHEMAN!
As sure as eggs are eggs, IF THIS GUY EXISTS, he sure in hell saw Jane Tanner, Gerry McCann, Jez Wilkins, and they ALL sure in hell saw him!
And they ALL sure in hell heard each other on that quiet street!
AND HALF THE VILLAGE SURE IN HELL WOULD HAVE HEARD THE LOUD MOUTHED McCANN THEY WOULDN'T NEED TO BE OUTDOORS FOR THAT!
As soon as such a true and proper production was aired, not a living person would believe the story told by McCanns and their buddies.
But THAT is precisely why Andy Redwood NEVER WENT WITH THE TRUTH when he did his little piece for Crimewatch.
And THAT is precisely why the McCAnns NEVER WENT WITH THE TRUTH when they did the little pieces/documentaries they put together along with Dodgy Dave Edgar their private detective.
No need for wayback machine to solve this case, just do the obvious, take the McCanns and their buddies back, tot he night they reported Madeleine as missing.
Simple logic!
Crecheman?
Well he's just gotta be the the most crucial witness in this case now, and such a guy, one who could go way back 6 years, who could remember the items of clothing he wore and what his kid wore (and still produce them too) well he's gotta remember who and what he saw and heard that night.
He's gotta have a terrific memory. He could probably tell us what Tanner, McCann, Wilkins were wearing too!
Wayback machine?
Who needs it when there is Crecheman, and a bunch of parents who need to put their police witness statements to the test by simply doing a re-enactment!
One for TV of course, as as the group said they wouldn't see how it could be beneficial unless it was aired for the world to see.
Get to it then McCann, a re-enactment, based on the words of your police witness statements!
l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com
4th July 2015