Lying in the Sun

Would I Lie to You? - 3

Would I Lie to You?  - 3



A Hired Liar?


BBC Interview 2008 


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nf2OpJLfwus&feature=youtu.be




Clarence Mitchell:


"There is absolutely no evidence to suggest Madeleine has been harmed let alone killed as many people assume, and the longer actually it goes on without a single trace of her they actually draw strength from that because they hope against hope that she is being held somewhere and hopefully being looked after,

 Until their private investigators have exhausted every possibility they are never going to give up that hope or give up looking for their daughter."



E
ND




Well there we have it straight from their spokeperson's mouth back in 2008.

  • Never will the McCanns give up hope.  

  • Never will they give up looking for their daughter.

  • Not until their private investigators have exhausted every possibility will they give up.

It was in 2008 that the McCann private investigators had produced the E.Fits based on the sightings of the Smith family, of a man who Mr Martin Smith believes to be Gerry McCann, carrying a child who he described as fitting the description of young Madeleine McCann.

  • The McCanns did not circulate these E.Fits.  
  • They did not flash them around the world.  
  • They did not include them on their Find Madeleine Website. 
  •  They did not - as they did with the false sighting by their holiday buddy Jane Tanner - hold a highly publicised press conference where the image was presented to the world.

An image which remains on their Find Madeleine website, SIX months after Metropolitan Police stated this was
not
the alleged abductor.

(Portuguese Police reached that conclusion almost 7 years ago - took Andy from the Met Police almost three to figure it out!)

Why would that be, that the image of the British father carrying his child home remains on the McCann site?

The E.Fits though - McCanns concealed them FROM THE PUBLIC for years!

It was in 2008 that Mitchell told the BBC's Bill Turnbull that the McCanns will not give up until their private investigators have exhausted all possibilities.

I ask:


  • How can suppressing crucial E.Fits ever be construed as 'leaving no stone unturned?
OR
  • As Exhausting all possibilities?

Bottom line is - It can't!


Whatever was the McCanns reason for not allowing those E.Fits into the public domain, hindering their daughter's chances, if alive of being found 'unharmed' as Mitchell and the McCanns, continually repeat (never heard anything quite so ridiculous, they believe their daughter was taken by a paedophile but they also believe she is unharmed) hindering any investigation which may lead to discovering what became of her  - I'd like to hear these parents explain that to the world.


I'd like to hear why they continued to accept donations to their Fund, knowing they were sitting on crucial information?  Asking the public to look out for Madeleine.  Look out for Madeleine when on holiday in Europe with their own families..



NEVER DID THEY SAY TO THE PUBLIC -


GO TO OUR WEBSITE, TAKE A GOOD LONG LOOK AT THE IMAGE OF THE MAN SEEN BY THE SMITH FAMILY, AND LOOK OUT FOR THIS GUY WHEN YOU ARE HOLIDAYING'  THE SIGHTING OF THIS GUY IS OUR BEST LEAD.  PLEASE KEEP A LOOK OUT.


They never asked the public to do this, for one, because:

THEY HAD NEVER PUBLISHED THE IMAGES OF THIS MAN ON THEIR SITE!


If they are innocent of all involvement in their daughter's disappearance, they had nothing to lose by having the E.Fits circulated, and everything to gain!

  • Why else would they have commissioned them if they were not to be used to help find Madeleine?

  • Did they simply want to know if what/who Mr Smith saw, the guys description came close to that of Gerry McCann? 

The Portuguese Police Investigation was shelved at the time the McCanns had these E.Fits put together.

Perhaps if McCann had presented them to the world at that time, then  the investigation into Madeleine's disappearance could have been re-opened years earlier?

That aside, they hindered their own private investigators search by not allowing publication of the E.Fits. 

What kind of parents do that?


That folks - is unforgivable!

  • Unforgivable that they left their three kids alone every night, alone and afraid.
  • Unforgivable they did so knowing their kids had been awake and crying in their absence.
  • Unforgivable that Gerry McCann said he saw the bedroom door open, knew none of his children had been out of bed, so knew someone else had opened that door, and yet he walked out to the bar again leaving three kids, his three kids vulnerable to whomever he claims must have been in that apartment!
  • Unforgivable that they have lied, and changed their witness statements.
  • Unforgivable that they accepted donations to that Fund and used it in the ways which they have.
  • Unforgivable that they accepted donations to that Fund knowing they were sitting on those E.Fits.
  • Unforgivable how they have treated so appallingly officers of the law and others who have only Madeleine's interest at heart.
  • Unforgivable that Kate McCann penned that appalling piece of shit (and I make no excuse for my description) her book 'Madeleine' and declared it was dedicated to her three children.  It is so full of lies and contradictions, all which can be proved when compared to interviews they have given.
  • Unforgivable, their every action, deed and word concerning the disappearance of this little girl.

John Stalker, the retired British detective said the McCanns and their holiday buddies are hiding something -
and he didn't just mean the E.Fits!

Whenever in the case of a missing child have the parents called the shots?

McCanns have!

  • They decided they would not co-operate with police.
  • Decided they would not participate in a police reconstruction unless the conditions they laid down were met (or t be more precise, their buddies decided not to fully co-operate (McCanns as suspects at the time had no choice in matter) and without their co-operation the reconstruction could not take place.  They collaborated in doing this, getting the McCanns off the hook.  Telling police unless the 'suspect status/arguido status) was lifted from McCanns they were not prepared to co-operate.     Hell yeah they did.  WHO dictates such things to the police anywhere in the world?
  • Allowed the deadline date for shelving of the original case to pass.  They could have requested that this not come to pass.   Co-operating in a reconstruction would have allowed for the case not to be shelved at that time.
  • Hid the existence of the E.Fits from the public, the same public, who they asked to search for Madeleine.

When did parents ever get to decide what should and should not be part of a police investigation into the disappearance of a missing child?

When ever have the parents of a missing child, at a time they were suspects in that child's disappearance been allowed access to official police files?  A UK Court granted McCanns this, access to certain files, at at time when they were official arguido/suspects in the disappearance of their daughter.

When have the parents of a missing child ever before taken legal action against the police officers who worked the case, because they don't like the finding of the investigation?

So much in this case has alarm bells ringing not least those E.Fits, and of course the dogs!   

But those pesky dogs won't go away, neither will the pesky police officers who don't believe a word of their story, the pesky 48 questions or the pesky members of the public who from day one, knew that something just didn't add up.

We now know that none of it does!


l-azzreri-lies-in-the-sun.com
6th April 2014

Website Builder