Eye Poppers -
Inextricable Webs of Deceit
Andy Redwood Metropolitan
Police tells us that the libel trial the civil action in Lisbon, and the Metropolitan
Police investigation are separate.
I agree they should be.
But that said the timing of the launch of Redwood’s PR Campaign/Crimewatch/Reconstruction,
and the nature of the libel action makes
it rather impossible not to speak about one without the other.
At the Palace of Justice in
Lisbon we have heard testimonies from the McCann witnesses, family members wherein
they were untruthful, one member in
particular – Michael Wright who got it completely wrong!
He has landed the McCanns in
all sorts of trouble, forcing Gerry and Kate McCann their lawyer in Portugal to
scramble around to request that they now be ‘heard.’ A desperate salvage attempt!
Prior to this neither had
planned to testify!
Away from Lisbon and the
libel trial we have Andy Redwood plugging his ‘Madeleine is alive, we have many thousands of new witnesses and tons and bucket loads of new
evidence’ a bunch of old mobile phone records, the name of their owners who all
either used or didn’t use their phone that night, but hell what does that
matter’ AND a revelation which
he will keep up his sleeve until the screening of his Reconstruction on
Crimewatch!
What he did reveal - a little tid bit to tide us over until Monday night –
and to prevent the public suffering the same painful looking eye-popping which
Redwood experienced when simply speaking of his revelation – is that, to make
his Reconstruction fit the crime –
he has had to change a few bits and
bobs! OOPSY!
Seems the ‘accepted version’ of accounts is no
longer…like Madeleine it too has vanished!
Rather beggars belief that Andy
Redwood appears not to know or understand that the Portuguese Police never accepted
the McCanns version of events – before, during or after the time frame he has
announced his team have worked on.
And at the risk of making
his eyes pop and roll across the floor of the Belgravia Office – and judging by
that video of Andy, there is every chance that might happen – a bit of
over-acting going on there - neither did the vast majority of the public!
The problem was – the McCann
party would not return to Portugal to take part in a reconstruction of events,
to clear up the inconsistencies in their stories!
Until Crimewatch is screened
it is difficult to determine which elements of the original investigation it is
that he refers to as the ‘accepted’ version.
(If there is one piece of
advice I can offer Redwood it is – that if it comes out of the mouth of a
McCann – don’t accept it! If he keeps to that rule of thumb he won’t
stray too far from the truth of what happened on the night Madeleine vanished)!
I’m guessing though that
unless it is his intention to trash the entire tapas version of events - he will
have kept Tanner’s statement, her sighting.
And he will still go along
with the statements by the other members of the group.
He has declared them
non-suspects so as such he is not going
to dabble around with their statements, despite them not making any sense whatsoever, the inconsistencies too numerous
to mention, their accounts quite clearly
and obviously not true.
I reckon Redwood's revelation
has got to be the introduction of ‘another’
Someone who saw something, and of course this ‘someone’ will have to have seen
this ‘something’ before the round of
‘checks of the children’ by the
McCann party.
There is no way in the world
that Redwood and his team of officers have not also noted the inconsistencies
in the McCann group statements.
There is no way in the world
he and his team of officers can make sense of them other than to admit that the
group has lied!
And there is no way in the world that Redwood and
his team did not note that Gerry McCann changed his police witness statement, which
should have given them cause to doubt the versions of ALL in the McCann party
and in particular Kate and Gerry McCann!
Perhaps I am being too
generous now when I say that Redwood and the Metropolitan Police were, in my opinion, dealt a
bad hand. These officers were given ‘mission
impossible.’
Impossible in that if they
were to bury this case, paint the
duo a whiter shade of pale than they
themselves were professing to be, and do a paint job on the their tapas mates too – then they had more than an
uphill climb – they had, and have mission impossible.
Nevertheless they appear to
have accepted it and are rolling with it!
Redwood has stated that he has
concentrated more on the period before Madeleine was taken.
Unfortunately he is only concentrating overall on
the time between 8.30pm pm and 10pm, unfortunate as this leaves out one of the
major “wrongs.”
David Payne said he visited Kate McCann on that
evening, before 8.30 pm he did so at a time when Gerry McCann was not ‘at home.’
Something Payne had not previously done during this
holiday.
Kate McCann confirms this visit.
However they disagree as to how long David Payne
was at the apartment.
One stating it was only 30 seconds.
One stating it was 30 minutes!
Now in anyone’s book that is
some discrepancy and why on earth
would David Payne be having a secret visit at Kate's place?
I say secret, as David Payne
just happened to forget to tell his wife Fiona of this visit (see police
statements – she only learned of this much later)
Another “wrong” is the Gerry McCann police witness statements!
(See Maddie and the Met)
The Portuguese were on the ball – they knew when they were being fed a line, led up the garden path – or just being plain lied to!
It makes it rather difficult
to see how the Metropolitan Police could think differently or see this any differently.
John Stalker retired British
detective, like the Portuguese Police was onto this right away!
Just as everyone is onto Andy Redwood - Sky quoted Andy Redwood as
follows:
“Our work to date has significantly
changed the timeline and the accepted version of events that has been
in the public domain to date.”
We have had Gerry McCann changing his story which is MORE than significant to this case in fact – crucial to the whole tapas tale!
Changing a story – or lying we can see how that happens and can see the reasons, especially in Gerry McCanns case why he would have done so…because he and his wife Kate messed up, one told one tale, the other told a different one! When they realised what they had done – Gerry popped to the cop shop seven days later and said 'I wanna tell ya another story!'
Green light for guilty must have been flashing
furiously in Praia da Luz Police Office, and understandably so!
What had to be established –
the reasons behind changing his story – of
course it didn’t tie with his wife’s version of checking the children, we can
see that, but why was that exactly? How could that happen when they had worked out
a checking system which they faithfully followed? They
had their routine which they both knew.
So what is McCann, his wife Kate
McCann and their holiday companions guilty
of that required such a dramatic change to their tale of abduction, to Gerry
McCanns movements on that night?
Gerry McCann we see can
change his story at the drop of a hat if it is required.
But how Andy Redwood has managed
to change the actual timeline will
be one to watch – Redwood’s ‘revelation’ is sounding as though it might not
just be, eye popping but a ‘Modern day Miracle at the Met’ but then he is after all working closely with the lady
who holds the key to not only various churches but to the mystery of the
disappearance of Madeleine McCann – How could miracles not happen in her
presence?
If not a miracle - just another chapter in the Inextricable Web of Deceit.
l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com
13th October 2013