Lying in the Sun

Head, Shoulders, Knees &

Head, Shoulders, Knees & Toes... Knees and Toes...

And Eyes and Ears...

Kate McCann:

"Every pair of eyes and ears makes a big difference to the search"

So Kate McCann tells us that every pair of eyes and ears makes the difference to a search for a missing person. And who could argue with that?

When images of the missing person are made known to the public, distributed far and wide, when images of a perhaps abductor in a missing persons case, are made known to the public distributed far and wide, indeed every pair of eyes has something to look out for, and that without question could make a difference, a big difference to the chances of the missing person, the abducted child being found.

So, it would be rather difficult to argue with Kate McCann over that statement.

But on the other hand, it is an astounding statement, when we consider the case of her OWN missing daughter.

The McCanns kept from EVERY PAIR OF EYES, the E.Fit images, which they had drawn up, images based on the police witness statements we are told, given by the Smith family who said they saw, close up, on the night Madeleine was reported as missing, a man, fitting the description of Gerry McCann, carrying a child fitting the description of Madeleine McCann.

The McCanns CHOSE for whatever reason NOT to publish the E.Fits. NOT to let EVERY PAIR OF EYES view these E.Fits. They kept them out of the public domain. Kept them from the eyes of the world.

By so doing, they denied Madeleine a chance of being found, and they denied the public, all of those pairs of WILLING eyes the opportunity to make the BIG DIFFERENCE to a search for Madeleine, the type of search which Kate McCann now speaks of.

If I was at this moment a parent of a missing child, knowing what Kate and Gerry McCann did to Madeleine, by not disclosing the E.Fits, which they had in their possession for over 5 years, I would have grave concerns as to them being considered responsible parents, hardly could they be considered responsible having left three kids in the way that they did on that vacation, alone every night, it demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of the needs of young children, their need to be kept safe, protected. And their further actions regarding the non disclosure of the E.Fits, raises questions, grave concern as to where their priorities lay in this respect as clearly it was not with Madeleine. Their actions raise concerns about Kate McCanns as a mother, the mother of a missing child, and grave concerns about her suitability as Ambassador of a charity for missing persons. It is disturbing that she speaks of EVERY PAIR OF EYES making a difference to a missing person, when SHE HERSELF chose to DENY a missing child, her OWN missing child EVERY chance, any chance for EVERY PAIR OF EYES in the world, to help find her.

WHY? WHY? WHY? WHY WOULD THAT BE?

There has been much debate as to whether the person the Smith family claim to have seen was in fact Gerry McCann. Whether it was, whether it wasn't - who knows.

But who knows either, WHY the McCanns CHOSE to NOT publish E. Fits which are now, according to DCI Andy Redwood, images of the main suspect/person of interest, in the Metropolitan Police investigation concerning the case of missing Madeleine McCann.

WHY WOULD THE PARENTS OF A MISSING CHILD, A CHILD THEY BELIEVE IS ALIVE AND FINDABLE, HAVE E.FITS PRODUCED AND THEN NOT USE THEM FOR THE OBVIOUS PURPOSE ?

WHAT OTHER POSSIBLE REASON COULD THERE HAVE BEEN FOR THEM TO HAVE ARRANGED FOR SOMEONE TO PUT THEM TOGETHER?

Did they want to know IF the descriptions given by the Smith family resembled Gerry McCann?

WERE THESE E.FITS produced at the time we are being led to believe?

WERE THE E.FITS produced during DCI ANDY REDWOOD'S time on OPERATION GRANGE?

The Smith family would be able to confirm the date for sure, surely?

Just like Crecheman, will be able to confirm the date DCI Redwood's Metropolitan team of detectives interviewed him, and confirm also WHY he was coming FROM THE WRONG DIRECTION if he had, as Redwood claimed in Crimewatch, just picked up his daughter from the night creche! FIRST THOUGH he would have to make himself KNOWN!

McCanns have NEVER at any time, that I am aware of, given, in any interview, any reason or explanation as to WHY they chose NOT to make these E.Fits known to the public, chose NOT to allow EVERY PAIR of EYES to make a difference to the search for their daughter.

(There was in the press, a statement attached to a McCann 'source' wherein the reason for NON DISCLOSURE was said to have been down to a lack of finances, McCanns/Madeleine Fund. They could not meet costs of everything. ) Quite frankly if the source of this statement is indeed attached to Team McCann then they want 'called out' because that has got to be the most LUDICROUS (to use the McCanns £70,000 per year spokespersons favourite word ) explanation they could have given.

IT:

Would not have cost them one cent, not a penny to publish these on their website.

Would not have cost them one cent, not a penny to have them published in press.

Would not have cost them one cent, not a penny to sit in the many TV interviews they have taken part in over the past 8 years, and held up these E.Fit images.

They didn't! They didn't even mention in interview the existence of the E.Fits.

Mitchell, being paid around £70,000 per year from the Fund for Madeleine, where £m's were raised by the public to help find the missing child, and the 'source' said to be attached to Team McCann, said they, could not afford to publish!

What is this Fund for Madeleine, it's name? Oh yeah. NO STONE LEFT UNTURNED.

Well a whacking great big heavy rock was left unturned when they FAILED TO PUBLISH THE E.FIT IMAGES.

And just let me check again, Kate McCann is Ambassador of Missing People, a charity to assist missing people?

It is more than suspicious that they had E.Fits put together of what is arguably the best and most promising sighting in this case, yet kept quiet about it.

Presumably they paid a professional person to put these E.Fits together, so they had the finances to cover the cost of that little exercise, but just didn't have the monies to distribute?

And WHO might this person be, or are we to believe Gerry sat with a packet of Crayola, so as to keep the costs down?

Difficult to comprehend that these parents were sitting on these E.Fits at the very same time they were asking the public not only to keep their eyes peeled, but asking those same members of the public for cash.

More incredulous in this case is that, not a one, not a single journalist, TV presenter when interviewing McCanns dared ask them WHY? No one asked them WHY THEY KEPT E. FITS FROM THE EYES OF THE WORLD?

DCI Andy Redwood in the Crimewatch production of October 2013 declared the person in these images as being the main suspect in this case, yet NO ONE asked the McCanns - WHY, WHAT REASON, did they have for never having produced them, 5 years earlier. No one asked why they were kept under wraps for 5 years.

NO ONE during that Crimewatch production, or at any other time ASKED DCI REDWOOD, why the McCanns had never disclosed this information which they had held for so long. Information which had become most crucial to the Metrpolitan Police investigation. Information/E.Fits which Redwood, at the time of the launch of Crimewatch, had had in HIS POSSESSION, for a very lengthy time.

I don't know what is more astonishing:

McCanns not disclosing them, keeping them under wraps for years, not allowing the public to see them.

Redwood not disclosing them, keeping them under wraps for over a year (?) which he did.

No one when interviewing the McCanns, asked the obvious question - 'Why in hell did you not make these E.Fits known TO THE PUBLIC from the earliest? You were MORE THAN KEEN to get the Tanner sighting out there huge pantomime over that one, yet NO publicity for a MUCH BETTER LEAD, by a FAMILY OF INDEPENDENT WITNESSES.

Why did Kirsty Young the presenter on Crimewatch, not ask that question of either the McCanns or Redwood?

The watching world must have been waiting for exactly that to happen.

No one asked the McCanns why they did not publish them on the Madeleine Website, which would have cost the McCanns not a penny.

No one asked the McCanns why they did not shout from the rooftops about these E.Fits.

No one asked them why they did not ask the press to publish them.

They had every means and financial resource if required to have the E.Fits made known, but they chose not to.

And that is a question the public needs answered -WHY?

They took the money from the public. Asked them to search. But kept from them, perhaps the most crucial piece of information in this case, IMAGES of the now, main suspect.

There had to have been a discussion by the Board of Directors of the Madeleine Fund, which consists of Gerry and Kate McCann, family members and friends.

How did that discussion go down?

'Right we've got these great E.Fits put together based on the descriptions given by an entire family, the Smiths, who witnessed, on the night Madeleine vanished, just right around the time Kate discovered her not to be in bed, missing, of a man carrying a little blonde haired girl of around Madeleine's age, wearing pyjamas, as Madeleine was when she was taken. It has got to be our best lead yet, our best sighting.

How shall we vote, what would be the best way forward?

1. Bury these E.Fits, keep them out of the public domain but continue to ask the public to keep their eyes peeled to look for Madeleine... oh and to take their money

or

2. Get these images out there for the world to see as quickly as possibly in the hope that someone recognises this guy and comes forward with information that will lead to Madeleine - that will 'let her come home.' (Gerry McCanns famous words to the alleged abductor - 'let her come home')

WHO ALL VOTED TO KEEP THE E.FITS HIDDEN, I WONDER? Got to have been the majority! But either way, these people, are the child's parents, extended family, family friends, Gerry McCann's colleagues - HOW could they vote against publishing?

Do we take it they just were not BUOYED by the chances of finding their daughter which the E.Fits presented?

Funny that because they are bloody darn well buoyed by just about everything else. Buoyed when they sell their book, buoyed when money rolls into the Fund, boy are they buoyed by that.

Maybe on the buoyancy scale, such a great lead, such a great chance of finding Madeleine, didn't rate?

It really is quite a sickening thought that the parents (their colleagues) their family and friends all those on the Board of the Madeleine Fund could have reached such a decision. A decision, if this child is alive, or was alive at that time, could have cost her, her life, caused her years and years of suffering at the hands of the paedophiles. That such a decision could have cost the twin children, their extended family years without Madeleine.

That such a decision could have been made by her parents and her family, beggars belief.

The McCanns sat there, through that Crimewatch production, which must have been months in the making, and said NOTHING about WHY THEY HAD KEPT THE E.FITS HIDDEN FOR YEARS FROM THE PUBLIC. THOSE EVERY PAIR OF EYES WHICH MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE TO ANY SEARCH FOR A MISSING PERSON, STATED KATE MCCANN, AMBASSADOR FOR MISSING PEOPLE.

MOREOVER - DCI Andy Redwood said NOTHING about why they had done so. And surely as a damn detective that must have been one of the first things he asked them when he discovered the existence of the E.Fits - WHY? WHY did they let their daughter down so badly by not producing the E.Fits at first opportunity.

I don't believe there can possibly be any valid reason for having acted in such an abhorrent way, for acting in a way which ABSOLUTELY MUST HAVE HINDERED THEIR DAUGHTER'S CHANCES OF BEING FOUND, WHAT HAPPENED TO HER BEING DISCOVERED

DID NOT A SINGLE JOURNALIST in the UK sit up and take notice, think to themselves when news of the existence of these E.Fits emerged - 'hell that's the first question I'm gonna ask the McCanns, WHY they kept the E.Fits a secret so long? Why they kept them a secret at all. I'm gonna put it to them that their actions may have cost their daughter her life. Their actions may have caused their daughter FIVE years of suffering in the hands of the paedophiles who they say they believe took her'

Is that not the strangest of things, extraordinary that no one in the MSM seemed interested in any way as to WHY?

They will print up ridiculous stories about what they refer to as trolls, but HELL, dare to suggest of them that they venture into the real world and ask a pertinent question of these parents, and they all scurry back into their holes. They don't want to know.

Martin Brunt, Crime Correspondent for Sky, could camp outside the home of an innocent woman and attack her, had no trouble asking questions, making false statements, scaring the living daylights out of this lady, literally! Yet does he DARE ask Kate or Gerry McCann why those E.Fits were not IMMEDIATELY MADE PUBLIC SO AS TO HELP MISSING MADELEINE?

FIVE YEARS LYING IN THE BOTTOM DRAWER OF SOME DESK AT McCANN HQ hardly demonstrates URGENCY, DESPERATION OR A DRIVE to help find a missing child.

Kate McCann said just recently that she is now MORE DRIVEN than ever to find Madeleine.

WHY?

That is what I would like to know, just simply, WHY?

Anyone ask her why? Probably not!

I'll be candid here.

Probably she said it because it was in her mind, the right thing to say when she was about to launch her cycle campaign.

Did anyone bother to challenge her statement, ask her, why is she now more driven? Did anyone bother to ask her what exactly she is doing, in her more driven state to find Madeleine? (Appealing to the public for more cash, and appealing for the public to look out for the kid when they are on their annual vacation, not acceptable answers. Doesn't cut it) WHAT is Kate McCann, in her newly found driven state, doing directly to discover what became of her missing daughter?

And if we are all truthful, it would not be hard to be more driven now, than at the MOMENT, they decided NOT TO PUBLISH, PRESENT IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN THOSE E.FITS!

At that time, back then, the McCanns had, unlike now, huge public support.

Can you imagine if they had posted this image on their website, it would have been downloaded a million times over, and the public would have pinned those images anywhere they could, just as they did the picture of Madeleine when she first disappeared.

McCanns throughout those five dark years when the E.Fits never saw the light of day, continued with their online shop, selling wristbands, t.shirts, and holiday packs with pictures of Madeleine. They asked the public to remain vigilant, to take a good look at Madeleine's picture in case they might spot her when on their vacation. WHY did they not do likewise with the E.Fit images?

Why no E.Fit image of this suspect, included in the holiday packs?

WHY NO E.FIT IMAGE POSTED AT AIRPORTS?

WHY, WHY, WHY, AND AGAIN, WHY WERE THESE E.FITS NEVER PRODUCED, IN WHAT FOR MADELEINE MUST HAVE BEEN FIVE TORTUOUS YEARS?

And why did NO ONE ask them then, and why is NO ONE asking them now, that very question?

There is a world of people out there who have been asked, and still are being asked by the McCanns for their help, a world of people WHO NEED TO KNOW WHY something so crucial which they could have helped with was denied them?

A world of people who want the McCanns to explain why they denied their daughter, what DCI Andy Redwood describes as one of the best leads in this case, a lead which would have given Madeleine a chance, if alive?

People can argue back and forth until the cows come home as to whether the Smith sighting is genuine or not, argue about the differences in the two images produced, which really are not so different, the features when examined, and if they are genuine, produced I would say by a different method, and perhaps slightly different due to the recollection of those who are the witnesses (but what two descriptions would be the same absolutely?) the bottom line for me is

WHY WERE THEY NOT PRESENTED TO THE PUBLIC AT THE TIME THEY WERE FIRST PUT TOGETHER?

That absolutely has to be what everyone should be asking, especially at a time when Kate McCann is telling the world that she is more driven than ever to find her daughter, and asking also of the public once again for monies, be that for the Madeleine Fund or for Missing People Charity, it makes no difference.

How can they be trusted?

The public donated to the Madeleine Fund in good faith.

The money in the Madeleine Fund has paid for much for the McCanns, and their friends. Clarence Mitchell, now a very close friend, as Gerry McCann described him, being paid around £70,000 per year from Madeleine Fund. The list of lawyers, press agencies, people making money out of Madeleine is astonishing also.

One can only assume that the E.Fits, the cost of these, would also have been paid for from the Fund, the Fund to which the public donated to help Madeleine.

Yet the one person this fund seems not to have helped is Madeleine.

The one person let down when that Fund, its directors chose not to publish those E.Fits, E. Fits paid for with the monies donated by the public, a decision kept from the public - was Madeleine!

The public have paid for, and for a very very long time - almost as long as those E.Fits were not disclosed - and unknown to them, for a whole lot of people to make a whole lot of money out of this Fund.

IF these E.Fits had been published for the public, for EVERY PAIR OF EYES TO VIEW, when they should have been (and there is not a single person out there if they have a shred of decency, can ever say it was right of McCanns to bury them for five years when a child's life depended on ALL LEADS and this such a crucial lead, the images bought and paid for by the public) and Madeleine was either found alive and well/or her remains discovered, then the McCanns would have had NO FURTHER NEED for the Madeleine Fund.

No need for them to continue to ask the public for money.

No need to pay lawyers, press agencies, lying spokespersons such as Clarence Mitchell, £70,000 per year from the monies donated to the Fund FOR Madeleine. (though why self declared innocent parents of a missing child required these services in the first place is questionable)

Gerry McCann said he would love not to have need of the Fund. Likewise Kate McCann in interviews.

Can't help but wonder more so then, and ask WHY they didn't produce the e.fits when they should have. An opportunity to find Madeleine and get rid of the Fund?

And can't help wondering, why in all of those interviews they gave, in those long five years where Madeleine if alive and suffering horrendously, and during their APPEALS FOR YOUR CASH, why NOT IN ANY of the FUND PAID STORIES and interviews given by Clarence Mitchell did he or they NOT mention the E.Fits.

Why when Darshna Soni, ASKED THEM DIRECTLY FACE TO FACE, if there was any SIGHTING which stuck out - any sighting which had given them hope, they did not say anything of the Smith sighting, the E.Fits produced from that sighting They did not say:

' Well actually we have had E.Fits drawn up of the man seen carrying a child of Madeleine's description, we are going to have them distributed worldwide so that EVERY paid of eyes can see the image of the person most likely to have taken our daughter?'

Instead Gerry McCann said:

"I'd like to say to you that we did have some hot leads but the very fact that we're calling for a complete review is telling you that more needs done that all the information needs to be put onto one data base...blah blah blah... the missing piece of the jigsaw"

What greater opportunity would there ever have been for the McCanns to hold up the E. Fits and shout:

'YES, YES, YES, we have a hot lead, please everyone take a look at this image, this IS the guy seen carrying off a little girl of Madeleine's description, right at the time Kate discovered her missing. This COULD lead to that missing piece of the jigsaw we keep speaking about.'

THEY DIDN'T!

THEY KEPT SILENT!

This question was put to them around 8 mins on the recording. Do watch closely the reaction of the pair at being asked this. The Gerry Shuffle. Kate's intake of breath, their discomfort at having being asked. IN FACT watch the whole video, watch all videos connected to this interview. Listen to the absolute and utter nonsense this pair fed the public. Note too how Kate McCann, when they are asked a particular question, states how they and Darshna Soni had already spoken of this at length, BEFORE going live with the interview.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsDZb5Ztv8I

Bear in mind when they are being asked this question THEY BOTH KNOW they have those E.FITS tucked away somewhere.

IT CANNOT BE HAMMERED HOME HARD ENOUGH WHAT THEY DID IN RESPECT OF THESE E.FITS.

In the Sandra Felgueiras interview, Sandra asked Kate McCann (who stated she had been studying the police files, the files which they had translated from Portuguese to English at a cost of £100,000) if there was anything in those files which jumped out at her.

Again, in the usual McCann way, deflection followed. She avoided the question by stating the only thing they wanted to find was WHO had taken Madeleine.

More importantly, she did not say - 'Oh we passed a copy of E.Fit images we have over to the Portuguese Police, having sent them AFTER the case was shelved.'

WHY NOT?

When Gerry McCann was asked on the steps of the Court Building in Portugal, about leads in this case, if he was going to demand, whilst in Portugal, a re-opening of this case. Deflection.

No mention of E.Fits!

When the McCanns and their Portuguese lawyer ISABEL DUARTE were telling the world's press that the Portuguese Police HAD NOT followed up on leads, THEY FAILED TO MENTION THE E. FITS.

IF they had passed to the Portuguese Police, at a time when the investigation was shelved, a copy of said E.Fits, WHY were they not SHOUTING ABOUT THIS?

Why were they not telling the world's press:

'Hey we even gave them a copy of E.Fits and they haven't re-opened the case based on this crucial information?'

When the Metropolitan Police acquired through legal channels, we are told, a copy of these E.Fits from McCanns, WHY DID THE McCanns NOT tell the world's press:

'Hey we gave the Metropolitan Police a copy of E.Fits and they, after a year or more of having them, still have NOT published them for the EYES OF THE WORLD TO SEE?' They are hindering an investigation. They are taking from our daughter a chance to be found alive and well. They are causing us anxiety, distress, we feel we may have to take legal action against them!'

To re-cap on the story of the E.Fits thus far :

McCanns held the E.Fits for over 5 years, without DISCLOSING them to the public, as part of THEIR OWN PRIVATE INVESTIGATION. An investigation, and E.Fits paid for through donations from the public to help find Madeleine.

A copy to the Portuguese Police, a police authority who no longer were investigating the disappearance of Madeleine, that is, they had shelved their investigation, pending new credible information coming to their attention or the McCanns and their buddies fully co-operating. This the McCanns stated in almost every interview they gave, that the Portuguese were NO LONGER searching!

They later, also gave a copy to the Metropolitan Police who, like the McCanns sat on these E.Fit images for a very lengthy time also. Who decided they would hold them until the screening of a Crimewatch production which was many months in the making, and which was ADVERTISED for many weeks before finally being released, in style of hollywood movie trailer.

Something is clearly SERIOUSLY WRONG with the story surrounding these E.Fits!

Something NOT BEING DISCLOSED - THE TRUTH!

Does ANY of this sound like parents/Metropolitan Police ACTING with URGENCY or CONCERN for a missing child, an alive and findable little girl?

Every pair of eyes and ears make a BIG DIFFERENCE when looking for a missing person said Kate McCann.

In this tragic and very dodgy case, every pair of eyes and ears, ARE MAKING A BIG DIFFERENCE, they are NOT ALLOWING, Madeleine to be buried like the E. FITS.

They are focusing on ALL of the lies, inconsistencies, the Fund, how it is spent. The far fetched tales, including those E.Fit images.

They will NOT fail Madeleine as she has been by so many others, including her mummy and daddy, their holiday buddies, her family, and friends of her parents, and EVERY DAMN HANGER ON who has profited, and continues to profit from her still 'absent' state.

THE EYES OF THE WORLD ARE WATCHING THE McCanns, perhaps more closely now than ever before. AND THEY ARE MAKING A DIFFERENCE.

And don't you just wonder WHAT REASON will be given to the twin children for their parents HAVING NOT DISTRIBUTED those E.Fit Images, to help bring home their sister?

In her piece for Missing People she speaks of

EVERY PAIR OF EYES AND EARS MAKING A DIFFERENCE!

that it is about

REACHING OUT FAR AND WIDE!

Now that just aint't gonna cut it with the twins, I wouldn't think, when those E.Fits for years, when in the possession of their parents, never got any further than a bottom drawer, were not allowed to reach, every pair of eyes, and not allowed to make a difference to the search for their missing sister, as part of their parents PRIVATE INVESTIGATION paid for by the public by their donations.

Far and wide, yeah right!

And what exactly did the McCann private detectives think of those E.Fits lying in the private files of Kate and Gerry McCann and not being used to help find Madeleine?

Did they know about them?

Will Kate McCann have on her T.Shirt at this Missing People Event, when she cycles far and wide, AN IMAGE OF THE MAN IN THE E.FIT so as to help find Madeleine? To help make a BIG DIFFERENCE in her daughter's case?

She is, she said, more driven than ever!

l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com
6th June 2015

Main Navigation

Head, Shoulders, Knees &