“Having
seen the circumstances and the lay-out of the apartment, it looks to me more
likely, the priorities are higher, that some harm happened to her within the
apartment. No more than that.”
Professor David Barclay – British Forensic Scientist
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id460.html
Dispatches
Documentary – The Search for Madeleine McCann
British Forensic Expert Professor David Barclay took part in
this programme.
Back to
zero is what DCI Andy Redwood tells us he has done with the
investigation which he is currently working on in reference to Madeleine
McCann.
Professor Barclay did likewise for his investigation took it back to zero.
It must be noted that Professor Barclay and the team of
experts from various fields who worked together for Dispatches Documentary, did
so only months after Madeleine vanished, therefore, much of what we now know regarding
this case, was not available to them back then, and certainly all the unsavoury
antics of the McCanns, and their
spokesperson Clarence Mitchell, had not reared their ugly heads quite as often as was to become the
case in the ensuing 6.5 years!
The vast amounts of money spent on protecting Kate and Gerry
McCann also had not been fully realised at that time.
So much has changed in respect of information now in public domain.
What would not change from the time Professor Barclay
investigated to now, is the findings of his investigation – that is the
forensic side of things.
Professor David Barclay this renowned British Forensic
Scientist appeared to have little doubt
back then that Madeleine came to harm in
that holiday apartment – that of course will NOT have changed!
I Wonder what he would make of the case now, in a general sense (not forensics) and I wonder
what he is making of DCI Andy Redwood and the Metropolitan Police
Investigation.
Professor Barclay having played a part in the Dispatches documentary, and the simple
fact that the Madeleine case is high profile, and he a forensic expert, I am
sure must have been agog to view DCI Andy Redwood’s Crimewatch stunt – Afterwards
– stunned no doubt!
It is worth looking back, taking a second look at Dispatches,
particularly so where they speak of the shutters, and give a demonstration as
to the fingerprints found on them, the position of prints. Barclay being convinced the shutter was
opened from inside!
Now one of the other experts in this programme pointed out
that well indeed, if someone (let’s say Kate McCann) had resided in the apartment
it could be that (she) had opened the shutter at some point during her stay, so feasible for
her prints to have been found there.
But if we consider the police witness statements by both Kate
and Gerry McCann – neither of them at any time during their stay in apartment
5A – opened the shutters!
This is information which the experts on the Dispatches
documentary would not have had available to them at the time the programme was
made.
David Barclay:
"If anyone can get in there through the sliding windows, why bother to go through the shutters in
the first place?"
"That little gate, which doesn't seem to have any lock on
it, goes straight onto the road."
"There's lots of light round that side (shutter side) and, erm, if you
look in there (patio side) there's shadows all the way up and it's easy to sneak out of this gate as well."
"Yes. Once you are in here, or you've jumped over that wall, I don't think anyone would see you. They certainly couldn't see you from the Tapas Bar."
24.50 (on recording)
" We just don't know what has happened because we haven't
got the hard physical evidence. I think we can realise that the two ends of the spectrum are now vanishingly small."
(1)
That
she wandered off by herself and is alive and well somewhere
(2)
That
some organised gang took her.
"It's a strange place for them
to take a child from. But we don't know whether she met some harm within the immediate family circle either accidentally or
deliberate
or
Whether somebody in the area did break in through either the child's
bedroom window or the sliding doors and took her.
It would be a really bizarre and strange crime if that took place but
bizarre and strange crimes do happen.
"How would you know there was a small child in there who
was your target? It must be that you've done some sort of pre-planning."
Voice over
The priority for forensic scientist
Dave Barclay would be to test the physical evidence to prove the accounts given
by the family.
34.11
" Going back to your point about the
forensics, when we look at the stuff to do with the family, because they've all
got legitimate answers, there we'd be looking for things that don't fit - anomalies
between what they're saying happened and what we have found out from our
observations.
Note
(This is a perfect example of the team of experts not knowing at that time of exactly what the McCanns had stated to police, for Professor Barclay and the team to review, they would now have anomalies, things that don't fit, too numerous to shake a stick at)
And they could range from just
difficulties because you're overcome by emotion, to what we call 'staging'.
The classic is a domestic murder,
husband and wife, and then the husband tries to make it look like a burglary.
Where he tries to clear up blood in the kitchen and doesn't do it successfully
enough: that's staging.
Professor David Barclay on Shutters of
5A
36.36
on recording
"You might try and help the shutter down mightn't you? If
the window is open and you are reaching it from inside you'd get that."
"We've some great stuff here because this is aluminium -
light-weight aluminium with a fine coating of a synthetic polyurethane paint or
something like that. It would mark really easily, and it does."
"And they're pretty well - you've pretty well got the whole of the thumb against it. If you go back the other way, and do the same thing again, right, now you've only got the outside of your thumb on it. I believe it's from the inside."
"We must be very careful that we're not
saying this is actually staging, but it
is difficult to see how anybody could have interfered with those shutters from
the outside without leaving some trace."
"In fact, having looked at them, I think it's almost
impossible."
"And indeed, if we did find blood. It's not unusual for children to trip and get a bloody nose and so on. If you found, in particular I think in this case, or any case like this, blood on the floor where efforts had been made to clean it up and the parents did not say they'd done that (as long as it was a child's blood) then that would be very significant indeed."
" Remember, forensic science is not just A single test
result, it's setting it in context. So if you get a result that seems to
indicate one thing, you'd want to confirm it by other tests from other areas."
David Barclay on hired car:
"I still find it very difficult to conceive how those
results got in the boot of the hire car IF they're as reported - and I'd like
to keep my options open. You still have to work out where the body has been and
how it got transported in that hire car that wasn't hired for 25 days. Just almost incomprehensible. So we should
just wait and see what the results show. It's not completely beyond the bounds
of possibility that they will completely exonerate the McCanns."
(NOTE - They never did - completely exonerate them! )
44.15 (recording)
"Having seen the
circumstances and the lay-out of the apartment, it looks to me more likely, the
priorities are higher, that some harm happened to her within the apartment. No
more than that."
Professor of Forensics David Barclay
l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com
1st May 2014