Lying in the Sun

Madeleine Untold Stories

Madeleine - Untold Stories

So many claim they know so much in the case of this missing child and when asked how they know, what they know, their claim is followed up by a further claim - that they will damage an ongoing investigation if they were to make known their claims.

We've had Andy Redwood a former DCI with the Metropolitan Police claim the McCanns and their buddies are not suspects in the case of their daughter Madeleine who mysteriously vanished when in the care of this group of adults.

I say in the care of the group, as the group have made claims and statements also.

Their claim is that THEY ALL were checking on the McCann kids, therefore they are all to a degree responsible for whatever happened to her.

They also ALL claim NOT to have been checking on each others kids, ONLY ON THE McCANN KIDS!

Further, they ALL claim too that none of them were checking at all on ANYONE's kids but their own.

And we have Matthew Oldfield claiming he was the only one (with exception of Kate and Gerry McCann) to check on the McCann kids ON THE NIGHT they reported Madeleine as missing.

Matthew Oldfield had never met the McCann kids before that vacation, seeing Madeleine only once when a tiny baby. Why would he be checking on them?

Jane Tanner, well she claimed she listened at the shutters of the McCann bedroom window, but NOT on the night Madeleine vanished.

And her husband claimed he entered the McCann apartment through an unlocked patio door and checked on the McCann kids, but NOT on the night they reported Madeleine as missing.

And then we have Gerry McCann, he claimed his buddy David Payne checked on his kids, the McCann kids on the Wednesday night, and he thinks Payne told him all was okay. McCann said he himself never checked on the kids of the others.

McCann and Payne are therefore at odds with each other's statements. Both are lying of course!

McCann also said that on the night O'Brien claimed to have gone into the McCann apartment, that NO ONE but he and Kate McCann entered that apartment. McCann said the apartment was locked securely, both front door and back patio door.

If so, O'Brien could not have waltzed through the apartment entering by an unlocked patio door.

McCann is therefore calling O'Brien a liar and vice versa.

And good old Matthew Oldfield (who checked twice on the McCann kids, so he claims, on the night Madeleine vanished, and one of these checks he claims, he took upon himself to carry out, without informing the McCanns of his intention to do so) well he was sick on one of the evenings and didn't go out to the bar with the others. and would you believe on that night RUSSELL O'BRIEN told police that he had taken the key to the Oldfield apartment to go and check on the Oldfield child.

Oldfield was IN his apartment. No need for O'Brien to go and check on the Oldfield child she was being looked after by her father.

What a fine mess this lot have gotten themselves into.

But tragically for Madeleine a mess involving her disappearance.

Payne? Well Payne said he NEVER checked on anyone's kids, not even his own. He and his wife Fiona Payne had a child monitor with them which they used when out of an evening so that they didn't have to leave the bar where they were at, to go check.

And then we have the story by David Payne where he said that BEFORE the group were set to go out for the evening that he went to visit Kate McCann at her apartment while Gerry McCann was playing tennis.

As is par for the course, the stories told by Kate McCann and David Payne, and indeed Gerry McCann on this count, do not tie up.

No surprise there!

Dianne Webster the mother of Fiona Payne's said no one was checking on each others kids, only their own.

Kate McCann said no one was checking on each others kids, and that she and Gerry McCann didn't check on anyone else's kids.

And Kate and Gerry McCann, to date they have NOT stated which NIGHT it was that they changed their checking routine, that is, they claimed they always entered the apartment by the front locked door, and this they changed, stating that at some point during the holiday, they changed this routine, from entering by the front locked door to using an unlocked patio door.

They have as is usual for them been evasive as to which night they changed to this routine, and evasive also as to a reason for doing so.

Other than McCann in his little documentary saying, that he changed from using front door to using back patio door because of the 'noise' that he didn't want to wake his kids.

(to make such a statement would imply that his kids had been awake at some point, when left alone in the apartment, while he and Kate McCann were out enjoying themselves. It implies that a specific noise related to the front door when he or she accessed, had caused the kids to wake, and that he did not want a repeat of this, so had changed routine)

No explanation what noise he was referring to.
No mention of which night he made this change.

And no explanation as to which kid this noise had woken, or if it was one, two, or all three of his kids who had been disturbed by this 'noise.'

No mention of how he comforted them to get them back to sleep, and how long this took.

(And bear in mind, his FIRST statement to police, he said on the night Madeleine vanished both he and his wife Kate McCann used the front door and used their key to unlock it to gain access. Nothing mentioned at that time by Gerry McCann about having changed their routine. SEVEN DAYS after this statement, he came up with the story of the unlocked back patio door)

We also have the statement by Gerry McCann, that when HE did his check, saw the bedroom door more widely open, that he thought Madeleine had gotten out of bed. He thought she had been wakened by the noise from the twin kids - (presumably their crying)

Now these statements quite clearly cannot all be true. But these are the claims made by the parents and their buddies.

And there are many more such claims by the group, which quite obviously are not true.

Essentially a bunch of lies, by a bunch of liars!

Which brings me back to the claims made by the former DCI Redwood, who once led the Met investigation, Operation Grange re missing Madeleine.

Anyone reading the above, and learning that the parents and their buddies lied, misled the police in Portugal, and the UK police also, by not being truthful in their claims and statements, must be astounded, not only that they would lie in the case of a missing child, but more astounded that the former DCI would make such a claim - that these people were not only, not suspects in the case of this missing little girl, but they were of no interest to the investigation.

Of course some have said, that he could not have acted otherwise, as if he was investigating them, not declaring them innocents, would alert them to this.

This is an investigation that followed the initial investigation in Portugal, it commenced, what 3/4 years after Madeleine vanished?

Unlike the initial investigation when all was fresh, when these people were still making statements, where they could be caught out, the Met were handed on a plate 30,000 records, many containing hundred of pages (said DCI Redwood) from the Portuguese. So a huge investigation by the Portuguese Police. All that the group had said was already documented. He Redwood/Met had also, the statements the group gave to the Leicestershire Police, which as we can see above, is a mountain of lies, and counter lies by these people. And quite obviously so.

These people KNOW what they have done, KNOW they have not been truthful with police authorities.

Four years down the line when the Met began their review and then investigation, there was no need to make such a statement to the effect that these people were not suspects.

They, the Met claimed they would not be making a running commentary on the case. All good and well. So why the need to make any claim at all regarding the innocence/guilt of these people.

Why not simply stay schtum on this?

So, no I do not hold with this - 'oh the Met had to say the group were innocent so as to not alert them to any investigation.'

Of course there are cases where a police authority has said when pressed, that a suspect was not a suspect in a bid to put the press or suspect off the scent.

But really, in the McCann case, a case they began investigating 4 years down the line after the child had disappeared!

DCI Redwood made many claims during his time on Operation Grange. None of which have led to discovering what became of Madeleine.

DCI Redwood also led the public up the garden path with his Crimewatch production. A production where he re-hashed the McCann story, their timeline, to suit his own, and with no evidence whatsoever for having done so. A re-hash of their tales with one of his own.

His tale allowed Jane Tanner, Matthew Oldfield, Kate McCann, and Gerry McCann off the hook in the outrageous statements they gave as to their movements on that night.

The DCI's tale allowed the story by Gerry McCann, Matthew Oldfield and Kate McCann regarding their alleged checks INSIDE the apartment that night to go unchallenged.

The DCI's tale allowed for the story of that alleged open bedroom window to go unchallenged.

The DCI's tale allowed for the story the more open bedroom door to go unchallenged.

(the DCI said the alleged abductor struck just before 10 pm, so WHO opened that bedroom door as described by Gerry McCann, on his visit to the apartment at just after 9pm)

The DCI's tale allowed for the unlocked back patio door story to go unchallenged.

The DCI's tale allowed for the front door story (was it/wasn't it, un/locked) as Gerry McCann couldn't remember whether he had locked it or not. Well that is the tale McCann told in ONE of his versions.

The DCI's tale allowed for no challenge on Gerry McCanns CHANGE OF STORY. McCann first told police he entered by the front locked door using his key to gain access. SEVEN DAYS later he changed his story. Seems he forgot he had entered the apartment by an unlocked patio door for which he did not require a key to gain access.

Huge difference in Gerry McCanns claims here:.

In claim one - his front door version. He had to walk a distance passed the unlocked back patio door, walk to the top of the street, a 'T' junction, take a left, walk a few yards, enter a car park, cross the car park, head towards a little opening which led on to a footpath, walk along this footpath passing the shuttered window of the bedroom where his kids slept, and just beyond was the front door. Had McCann taken this route he would have seen instantly if that shutter window was open.

McCann claimed too in his first version that, his wife Kate McCann, on her check, had followed this same route, entering the apartment by this same front door, using her key to unlock it.

Had Kate McCann taken this route she too would have seen that the shutter and window were open.

WAS THIS THE REASON McCANN NEEDED TO CHANGE HIS STORY SEVEN DAYS LATER, BECAUSE QUITE OBVIOUSLY HAD THEY BOTH ENTERED BY THAT FRONT DOOR, HAVING TAKEN THE ROUTE THEY CLAIMED TO HAVE DONE ON EACH OF THE NIGHTS THEY ABANDONED THESE KIDS, THIS FRONT DOOR STORY EXPOSED THEIR LIES. EXPOSED THEIR TALE OF A JEMMIED WINDOW AND SHUTTER FOR WHAT IT WAS - A TALE INVENTED TO BEEF UP THEIR STORY OF AN ALLEGED INTRUDER? A SHUTTER WHICH I MIGHT ADD THE POLICE SAID WAS NOT DAMAGED IN ANY WAY, THAT IT HAD BEEN OPENED FROM THE INSIDE. AN INSIDE JOB, IN OTHER WORDS!

And Gerry McCanns second version:

He entered by the UNLOCKED back patio door.

For this he had to walk from bar, mid way up the street towards the apartment, open a little gate which was at street level. Climb a flight of stairs, open the child safety gate at the top of the stairs, which the McCanns claim they had locked, then slide open the unlocked patio door.

NOW I ASK YOU. McCANN A CARDIOLOGIST, HOPEFULLY WITH A GOOD MEMORY AS HE DEALS WITH THE HEALTH MATTERS OF THE SERIOUSLY ILL, HE LEAVES HIS THREE KIDS, THE ELDEST 3 YEARS OLD, HIS TWIN KIDS, 2 YEARS OLD, IN AN UNLOCKED APARTMENT. DOES THIS FOR FIVE NIGHTS ON THE TROT, CHECKS ON THEM A COUPLE OF TIMES A NIGHT SO HE CLAIMS, AND THE GUY CANNOT REMEMBER HOW HE ENTERED THAT APARTMENT ON THE NIGHT HIS DAUGHTER VANISHED?

PULL THE OTHER ONE McCANN!

This apartment located on the corner of a street, the doors, back and front, literally a street apart, gaining access to either side, not something one could forget.

And most definitely NOT SOMETHING one could confuse with the other.

How would it be possible to mistake that long walk to the top of the road, through a car park, along a narrow path in front of the kids bedroom window to the front door, with - having walked half the distance to a side gate, climbing a flight of stairs, unlocking a child safety gate at the top and then sliding open an unlocked patio door?

ITS IMPOSSIBLE TO HAVE NOT REMEMBERED WHICH DOOR.

So pull the other one DCI Redwood when you said that the Met Police do not only, not suspect the McCanns and their buddies of involvement in this child's disappearance, but when you said they were of no interest to the investigation. If the Met are not interested in the above statements made by these people, not interested in their movements on the night Madeleine vanished, and not interested in full and complete re-enactment of the events taking account of EVERY detail they have all given - then the investigation by the Met is a farce.

And why would Redwood retire just when he was about to get a result in the case of the most famous missing child on the planet?

In any police investigation this group HAVE TO BE OF INTEREST - how could they not be - those stories they invented? Those police witness statements?

But the now retired DCI he was no better than the group of adults who all claimed to have been looking out for her and her brother and sister - he was prone to porkies too - crechedad the perfect example!

And like the parents it would seem that he was in no rush either to trace the missing child/what became of her.

The good old ex DCI for weeks on end had his 'trailer' screened on TV, his REVELATION MOMENT, not to be missed, how he had changed the timeline, found Crechedad, and had two EFITS of his now MAIN SUSPECT.

His CRIMEWATCH PRODUCTION, HIS TRAILER HAD TAKEN MONTHS UPON MONTHS TO PUT TOGETHER.

So no rush to find the guy in the e.fits or to find Madeleine.

Would not a police authority having such information have released these E.Fits IMMEDIATELY when they came into its possession?

NOT THE METROPOLITAN POLICE!

AND NOT THE PARENTS!

Met had them for around 18 months I believe before they bothered their asses releasing them into the public domain.

McCanns they had them for YEAR AND YEARS and NEVER released them into the public domain!

NOW WHAT DOES THAT TELL US ABOUT THE McCANNS AND THE METROPOLITAN POLICE INVESTIGATION?

DID WE EVER HEAR THE McCANNS COMPLAIN THAT THE MET HAD NOT RELEASED THEM?

Course we didn't!

They ALL KNOW that Madeleine McCann is not alive! The evidence held, points absolutely to this being the case. There was NO rush by either party to find this 'alive and findable little girl' as Gerry McCann describes his daughter.

Only a mug would believe the contradictory and outrageous stories this group have told thus far.

Recently there have been other claims of another untold story of Madeleine, in fact BILLED as THE untold story of Madeleine McCann.

There is no such thing!

As always the person making the claim has failed to come up with this story. Like DCI Redwood's tale, there will be a trailer, a little teaser.

But of course, no more can be said. And yes, you have guessed it, because it will be detrimental to an ongoing investigation!

DCI Redwood was detrimental to his own investigation!

But this 'untold story' for someone, anyone to make such a claim, this person would, I think you will agree, have to know more, or at least have the same information which is held by the Portuguese Police, the Metropolitan Police and the Leicestershire Police?

And that folks is, where these claims of the untold story of Madeleine McCann must end! Clearly this person does not hold more information than police authorities. And IF this was/is the case - WHY was the information not passed to police investigating the crimes committed against Madeleine McCann?

We all know that Murdoch, Sky, has backed the McCanns, Martin Brunt being the dope to carry out much of the atrocious lies, and scams created, and none more horrible than when he did what he did to Brenda Leyland, going along also with the outrageous lowlife, Summers and Swan and their ridiculous claims. Yes they too, claimed to have the untold story. Shame on them. Shame on Brunt!

The person claiming to be releasing this latest 'untold story' of Madeleine, is on the Murdoch payrol. Up there then with Summers and Swan, Brunt! That has to be questioned, and for obvious reasons. Or maybe not - in fact - that ANSWERS any questions some may have!

There is ONLY ONE untold story in this case, and that is the TRUTH, a truth which Gerry McCann, Kate McCann, David Payne, Fiona Payne, Matthew Oldfield, Rachael Oldfield, Jane Tanner, Russell O'Brien, and Dianne Webster, hold.

It is a truth that I doubt this lot will ever speak of. They will not be lining up to confess to having been untruthful in their accounts of the evening the child was reported as missing.

They will never stand before the UK public, sit on the Lorraine Kelly sofa, stand before the world and admit that their stories don't add up, that they are, as retired British detective John Stalker said - HIDING SOMETHING!

What it will take for them to do what they know is right is anyone's guess. But while they, the buddies, believe they can lie low, and get away with it, not be challenged on their statements, which all can see, cannot be the truth. While Kate and Gerry McCann believe they can keep making appearances and have Clarence Mitchell invent story after story to protect them. When the UK media insist on printing untrue stories about the Portuguese Police, and failing to put in print the details which are known to thousands around the world, the truth of matters, when these people are being protected and funded financially also, they will ALL remain schtum.

Unless someone in the UK media grows a pair and tells the story as it should be, with honesty, then each and every one of them fail Madeleine, and all missing children.

Without the truth, Madeleine's Untold Story what became of her, what she suffered during that vacation, whatever she suffered on the day/night evil visited, will forever remain UNTOLD!

There is not a journalist/reporter out there, trumped up or otherwise, who knows the absolute truth of what happened to this child. Not a one can claim to have the untold story!

McCanns and their buddies - they KNOW!

lazzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com
22nd September 2015

Main Navigation

Madeleine Untold Stories