McCANN NEW PRIVATE INV/3

McCann New Private Investigation 2016/3


From McCann Website


Unidentified People of Interest to the Inquiry

These two pictures show a man carrying a child away from the family's apartment. This sighting was seen by a witness at 21:15 on the evening of Thursday, May 3rd, 2007.

Based or more recent information, the Metropolitan Police now believe this man may represent a guest at the Ocean Club who was carrying his daughter back to their apartment. However as it is not possible to be certain that these two men are actually the same person, if you have seen this man in the pictures or suspect who it may be, please contact the Metropolitan Police's OPERATION GRANGE on 0207 321 9251 (0044 207 321 9251 from outside the UK) or

Operation.Grange@met.pnn.police.ukand/or the Find Madeleine team on +44 845 838 4699 orinvestigation@findmadeleine.com


------------

Statement 2 - Paragraph 2

'Based on more recent information, the Metropolitan Police now believe this man may represent a guest at the Ocean Club who was carrying his daughter back to their apartment.  However as it is not possible to be certain that these two men are actually the same person, if you have seen this man in the pictures or suspect who it may be, please contact....'



Time now to deal with the 'NOT POSSIBLE'

Obvious question - WHY is it NOT POSSIBLE NOW, and WHY was it NOT POSSIBLE, BEFORE Crimewatch 2013, the Madeleine McCann Special, was aired, in UK and European countries, for Redwood, the Metropolitan Police to be certain?

And WHY did McCanns go along with this Crimewatch Special where the focus was REMOVED from the Jane Tanner sighting, if it was NOT POSSIBLE to be certain, that the person Tanner claims to have seen was this British dad?

MetropolitanPolice/Redwood (back then) have/had crechedad, the British dad who Redwood claimed was walking in the very spot, at the very time, dressed in the very way Jane Tanner described in her sighting, carrying a child, in the very same way as Jane Tanner described in her police witness statement.

AND, MORE IMPORTANTLY, Redwood the Metropolitan Police HAD, and still have the person more crucial than the British dad to this fantastic tale -  they have JANE TANNER THE STAR WITNESS!

Now one would have to assume, that as Redwood and the Metropolitan Police claimed they were ONLY ALMOST CERTAIN of the identity of the man Jane Tanner claims to have seen, that Jane Tanner was UNABLE TO IDENTIFY this British dad as the person she saw.

It stands to reason that if this British dad came forward, and SUGGESTED to the Metropolitan Police, SIX YEARS AFTER MADELEINE VANISHED, that he MAY be the person Jane Tanner saw (was this guy living on the moon - SIX YEARS LATER, when in that six years in the UK press and on TV it was wall to wall McCann/Madeleine stories, practically daily)  that at some point, the Metropolitan Police discussed this with Jane Tanner with a view to Tanner identifying said British dad?

And it goes without saying that Jane Tanner would have discussed this with the McCanns, their team, Clarence Mitchell, their lawyers, their team in Portugal.  WITH HER OWN LAWYERS, and I'll bet Tanner and her partner O'Brien have their OWN lawyers!

As Redwood declared that he, the Metropolitan Police were only ALMOST CERTAIN, then we have to assume that Jane Tanner failed in identifying this British dad as the person she claimed to have seen on that night.   Failed to confirm with absolute certainty that he was the man she told Portuguese Police she had seen.

You see, it was NOT for the British dad only to claim that he MIGHT have been the person Tanner claimed to have seen, it was for the WITNESS JANE TANNER to make a positive ID.

Tanner's police witness statement, we all know, was considered NOT credible by the Portuguese Police, and one can see exactly why that was.

But what is less credible than Tanner's sighting, is Redwood's CRECHEDAD!

It is not unsurprising then that this British dad, and Jane Tanner were NOT allowed to be part of the Crimewatch Production, 2013, Madeleine McCann Special.

How would that have played out?

Redwood introducing the man who MIGHT have been the guy, who Jane Tanner the witness DEEMED UNRELIABLE, claimed to have seen, on the night Madeleine McCann was reported as missing.  

Then introducing Tanner, herself as the witness who found it NOT POSSIBLE to identify this guy as the person she claimed to have seen on that night?

Yip,  Tanner was tucked away, safely out of the way, no chance of her appearing on Crimewatch and being interviewed by Kirsty Young, or answering any awkward questions, about her not being able to positively ID this British dad.  

And the British dad?  Well he was tucked away too, back in his box at Operation Grange HQ where he was invented!  Filed under 'C' for crock of crap - no, not for Crechedad!

Andy Redwood, the Metropolitan Police and whomever else was party to this nonsense that was Crimewatch 2013, and based on an outrageous story he created about a British dad - for whatever was his agenda (and it certainly was not to find whomever REMOVED Madeleine McCann from that apartment) a story held together, only on an 'ALMOST' a 'MAY' and a - NOT POSSIBLE for the STAR WITNESS TO IDENTIFY the British dad as the person she saw on that night - fed the world the biggest load of who shot john quite possibly ever told! 

And as I said previously by doing so, he left the McCanns their buddies their stories, their police witness statements in respect of their movements between 9.15 and 10.00 pm to go unchallenged, and leaves them free to continue to display on their website the images as above, and they can because REDWOOD SAID HE WAS ONLY ALMOST CERTAIN!

Redwood, the Metropolitan Police should have made ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN before he launched into his revelation moment in such a big way.

I guess he was caught up in the excitement of it, he did say it was EXCITING to have discovered Crechedad!

Funnily enough though, Kate and Gerry McCann have not shown the same interest, or excitement, about Redwood's Revelation Moment.

Did they NOT get to meet the man in person?   

Think we all know the answer to that one, they didn't, and Tanner didn't either!

What will be INTERESTING AND EXCITING, A TRUE REVELATION MOMENT, is when the NEW PRIVATE DETECTIVES, get to meet CRECHEDAD.

They surely will be wanting to meet the man of the moment!

And they surely will be wanting to meet Jane Tanner!

What a nice cosy meeting that would be.  Jane telling him what she saw, Crechedad telling Jane what HE saw!   How lovely!

I think sometimes we forget that unlike Tannerman, CRECHMAN CAN TALK!  (did a blog on this a while back) Crecheman MUST have seen and heard those other persons on the street - Tanner, McCann, Wilkins, and anyone else who was going about their business!

You see, Crecheman, UNLIKE Tannerman (the alleged abductor) was in NO HURRY, HAD NOTHING TO HIDE, DIDN'T MATTER IF ANYONE SAW HIM, he was but a British dad wrapped all warm and cosy, in his long pants, heavy outdoor shoes, and jacket,  carrying his child in the most awkward position ever, his child dressed only in her pyjamas, on a very cold evening (odd that, as British parents, wrap their kids warmly, something to do with the shit British climate) - HE HAD NOTHING TO HIDE OR RUSH AWAY FROM.

Maybe Kate and Gerry McCann will interview him when they commence their New PRIVATE INVESTIGATION?

Maybe he'll get a seat on the sofa at Lorraine's place?

Wouldn't we ALL just love to hear from Crechedad?  His story.  A Crechedad and Tanner Special!

But alas, I fear, when the curtain comes down at Grange HQ, poor guy will be thrown out with the rest!

Anyone ever wondered if the Portuguese Police got to interview crechedad, they, after all are the lead investigators in the missing Madeleine case.  They just gotta be interested in him, if not excited, by Redwood's revelation moment!

I guess that's a whole other story too!



l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com
4th January 2016